I missed the fact that there was a longer and better test, which wasn't as vague. I thought it was some kind of "pay to get tested" test at first.
I found it quite accurate and I still got 72 out of 155. I was completely sure that I scored very well on the ones relating to the persons (how they felt), and I might just done that and done awful on the rest?
"According to your self-report answers, your emotional intelligence is very poor. People who score like you do feel that they have trouble dealing with their own emotions and those of others. They struggle to overcome difficulties in their lives and they are unable to control their moods. It's hard for them to understand how best to motivate themselves and reach their goals. In addition, they find social interactions quite difficult, for several reasons. They may have trouble allowing themselves to get close with others, finding it difficult to be vulnerable enough to establish intimacy. They also report having trouble offering support to others, likely due to the fact that they do not understand where others are coming from or they lack ideas about how best to help. Perhaps by working on your problem areas, you can become more confident in dealing with your own emotions and those of others."
Didn't come as a shocker though.
Superfly wrote:
Damn, I thought I was doing very well, and answering the questions with the "right" answers rather than the "what I would feel" answers ... I have Social Phobia so I would probably feel panicky at the thought of a date rather than excitement. But I assumed excitement would be the intelligent choice.
I thought others would feel nervous, and here I thought I wasn't awful at understanding others in simple situations