Munin wrote:
I'm diagnosed with Aspergers and I can handle some types of math. I like geometry because it's visual. To some extent (apparently better than many people)I can intuitively manipulate shapes in my imagination. Angles, degrees, etc. make a lot of sense to me, because you can physically see how they work. Abstract math and algebra are awful for me. I can get by, but it takes a great amount of effort for me to understand. It makes no sense to me because I can't "see" the math working, and shuffling arbitrary symbols doesn't mean much to me. All my English teachers, on the other hand, said that I was one of the best writers they had ever taught.
I'm almost the exact opposite.
Numbers and abstract logical constructions using them make perfect sense to me, I have an intuitive feel for numbers and the ways they interact.
On the other hand, I have an almost complete disconnect between numbers and anything concrete like pictures (graphs, etc.) or music.
I understand that there is a relationship and can trace it point by point if necessary, but I can't look at an equation and have any idea what the graph would look like, or vice-versa.
So while I just 'get' numbers and math, the application to real world things often eludes me if it deals with things like spatial reasoning or translating numbers into things like pictures and music, although my intuitive feel for odds and percentages has often proven useful in various situations.
Strangely enough, especially for an aspie apparently, my skills at math and logic are only really exceeded by my reading comprehension skills which are off the charts and always have been.
By 2nd grade I was reading and understanding at a 12th grade level.
I'm not a very good writer, though, for some reason.