LovingTheAlien wrote:
Danielismyname wrote:
From a research paper (it appears to be an accurate predictor of autistic-like behavior):
... Such a high score on the AQ however does not mean an individual has AS or HFA, since a diagnosis is only merited if the individual is suffering a clinical level of distress as a result of their autistic traits.
So this means, that if people/society were nicer to aspies, they wouldn't be aspies (and happy aspies are not real aspies).
Thus, it is easy to cure AS: Society just has to be more tolerant.
What a great idea for a cure, similar to Attwood's idea of putting us in a room on our own.
So those with AS who are not clinically suffering at the time of assessment are not entitled to any services or treatments should any useful treatments be found. But the blind person would never be denied a diagnosis or services for the same reason.
eg. Sorry sir, you are coping fine so you're not blind. Good bye.
So either we have AS or not. Whether we are entitled to services should be a separate issue, so those with unbearable sensory issues might one day find a treatment that works, but I would never require those services as my sensory issues are mild, but I might benefit from other services.
I think we should lobby to have this issue considered in the discussions about DSM-V. Otherwise denial of a diagnosis is discriminatory.
_________________
AQ=36 - aspie quiz = 139/64
I see myself as neurodiverse with monologuing, stimming, perseverance, obsessiveness, prosopagnosia, anxiety, dyspraxia, executive dysfunction, s-l-o-w-ness and frequent word finding lapses.