Page 10 of 17 [ 268 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 17  Next

nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

03 Feb 2013, 8:03 am

EXPECIALLY wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
cakey wrote:
This a really good thread, I read through all of it. Although I am NT, i am very socially awkward and didn't understand why people bother with all the superficial talk either. Anyhow, for the example of the girl with the dress. If I were to think it's ugly yet she seems happy with it on, I wouldn't say what I thought, I know I would say something agreeable to what she thinks so that she can be happy. In other words, if I sense that what I say can or may the other person unhappy, I always refrain from saying it, even though they ask for honesty. I do know that of a friend comes to me and asks me "Am I fat" or "Does my hair look ugly" and if either are true, I won't say it because I know that in this conversation, the other person doesn't really want the truth, they actually want to bring their self esteem up through me saying things like, "No, never! You are great." Those are the only examples I know of since this is how girls talk around me and reaffirm each other's worth through their beauty or looks.

When it comes to strangers though or people that I am not comfortable with, I get lost and I do wonder their motives. For example, I was walking to school and then a very old and white-haired man stood and spoke in a formal tone, "Good Morning," while looking at me, I quickly mummbled back a"Good morning" and walked more quickly away...I wasn't sure how I was supposed to respond or what this old man's motive was. He definately wasn't a pervert...and I'm still baffled about it. There are more times where I am confused. But I just know that I never take what Nt's say literally unless I can't find a motive, otherwise, I always ask myself "What are they doing or trying to do?"


This is very interesting, to have an NT viewpoint

What I don't understand is that if as you say, your main focus is on saying things that are agreeable to what the other person thinks and that make them happy, how come a lot of the NTs I come across seem hell bent on saying things that have the sole aim of making me feel horrible about myself ie this is the stuff they say to each other about me in passing if they see me in town, on the street for example - far from not wanting to say anything to make me unhappy like you do for your friends, this is their main aim!

It makes no sense to me that NTs go on about all the stuff they don't say so as not offend other people and yet many seem to spend a lot of their time doing that very thing ie being very insulting and cruel about other people in order to hurt them. ie they don't follow their own rules.

Also I can't understand why you don't understand what that older man was doing - he was just saying hello. Because you always look for an ulterior motive you are going to be suspicious of any stranger that talks to you. I just take what they say at face value most of the time so it would mean he was just saying hello to me.


if you have any suspicions about this ''being nice'' among NTs l'd say you're right.

l'm curious to hear your theories lol. But l'm impatient -_- so l'll just tell you what l think.

They don't actually care. They don't give a sh** about being nice. lt's a kind of self congratulatory thing, self justification in thinking "oh, look at me, l'm this big hero and l'm taking the high road by not saying what l really think to this person."

Little do they know the person they are refraining from "being honest" with could be thinking worse things about them.

OR they simply don't want to take responsibility for what they really think anyway. l have to say l can be guilty of that, l'm not really going to tell a person how l feel if it is going to get me into some knee deep sh** with that person and they aren't the type that's worth arguing with.

Not talking about the situation with the above poster specifically lol xD And also my ranting against NTs, l guess would have to be viewed as ranting against...general BS >_>


I've got to go out now and won't be back until later but I am keen to discuss this issue as it is a major bug-bear of mine.

I generally deal with it by avoiding NTs - I see it that they speak a totally different language to me and that the chances of us understanding each other properly are minimal so what's the point?

I used to want their respect but as I get older it's less important and I'd rather just avoid their disrespect

Therefore I deal with them on a 'needs must' basis and it seems to work well for me!



EXPECIALLY
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 701

03 Feb 2013, 8:14 am

Hehe. K :-)


_________________
AD/HD BAP.

HDTV...

Whatever.


Ann2011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,843
Location: Ontario, Canada

03 Feb 2013, 8:43 am

Drebi wrote:
I heard more than once how people felt I talked at them rather than to them.

This is a good way of putting it. Talking to them implies an exchange and a learning about each other's present condition. And a consideration of their point of view. Talking at them is aggressive and can be quite unpleasant for the listener. If I wanted an encyclopedic tutorial, I'd go to Wikipedia. That's not what talking to someone is about.



cakey
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

03 Feb 2013, 4:12 pm

To nessa, about NT's who bring people down, I've met a lot before, now those are just like the OP said, their ulterior motive is to just feel better about themselves but talking down on others. Yes, it is so fake to not be honest, yet if my friend did have an ugly dress yet she loved it, I'd try to see how it's beautiful it is to her and try change my mind on it to help her out. I don't feel like I'm doing bad by saying good things to them because they already know themselves what they look like in the mirror and appearance shouldn't be important anyway. And when that friend asks how she looks I can tell from the tone that she wants me to agree since she loves it, although if I hint an uncertainty in her voice and face about the dress then I might say to try another dress. Yes, even I think this behavior is strange...but I do know if I outright said a dress was ugly or not flattering...they wouldn't think kindly of me, rather think I'm rude.



Mirror21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,751

03 Feb 2013, 4:40 pm

Ann2011 wrote:
Drebi wrote:
I heard more than once how people felt I talked at them rather than to them.

This is a good way of putting it. Talking to them implies an exchange and a learning about each other's present condition. And a consideration of their point of view. Talking at them is aggressive and can be quite unpleasant for the listener. If I wanted an encyclopedic tutorial, I'd go to Wikipedia. That's not what talking to someone is about.


but but . . why would i talk to someone for superficial reasons that accomplish nothing? that is such a waste of time. talking about the whether if I am not interested in meteorology, or about a magazine I have not read!

I do a great deal of "really" "no way" "you don't say" "its possible" "maybe" to avoid all that bull.



Ann2011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,843
Location: Ontario, Canada

03 Feb 2013, 4:53 pm

Mirror21 wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
Drebi wrote:
I heard more than once how people felt I talked at them rather than to them.

This is a good way of putting it. Talking to them implies an exchange and a learning about each other's present condition. And a consideration of their point of view. Talking at them is aggressive and can be quite unpleasant for the listener. If I wanted an encyclopedic tutorial, I'd go to Wikipedia. That's not what talking to someone is about.


but but . . why would i talk to someone for superficial reasons that accomplish nothing? that is such a waste of time. talking about the whether if I am not interested in meteorology, or about a magazine I have not read!

I do a great deal of "really" "no way" "you don't say" "its possible" "maybe" to avoid all that bull.


Haha . . . I do that too. Mine are "that's good," "awesome," "really," "that's awful" and "OMG."

I think the idea is that it's not the subject you are supposed to care about, but the other person's experience and interest. Apparently NTs get something from this. I don't. Honestly I really don't care about their experience. I guess I just participate so as to get along and be accepted.

Also, by listening to the other person, there is an expectation that they will listen to me. However, I am unwilling to share my feelings IRL, so I don't get to take advantage of this.



dianthus
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,138

14 Feb 2014, 10:26 pm

Bumping this old thread up because it's a great one.

Moondust wrote:
The only difference with aspies is that NTs intuitively learn, very young, that anything a person says has to be deciphered because the meaning is not literal. I discovered this in my forties.


^This is one of the things that still leaves me wondering if I am really autistic or not. I think I learned this intuitively at a young age. I've always known that people "do" things with conversation. I just can't always tell exactly what it is that they are getting at, and/or figure out how to respond to it. I am never really sure if I really understand the implicit meaning or not, unless I test it somehow.

As far back as I can remember I always wanted to just force people to say things directly because I couldn't stand all the hinting around. If I follow my instincts I basically just want to keep talking about something until I can drive it down to their exact precise meaning, which of course tends to annoy people, but how else am I supposed to know what they mean? I rarely do that anymore, but in highly charged situations that becomes my default way of handling things.

I have spent so much time analyzing the things people have said to me, it has probably taken up years of my life.



dianthus
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,138

14 Feb 2014, 10:56 pm

outlier wrote:
bloop wrote:
I do wonder if one of the reasons that aspies see NT conversation as manipulative and not to be trusted, is that they generally do not get close enough to form the types of relationships with NTs where it feels safe to express honest opinions. (This is an assumption based on what I've read on here, apologies if I'm off the mark). I just wanted to make the distinction between subversive "doing" conversation and positive, supportive "doing" conversation. I hope the above makes sense!


That could be a factor, but if someone has difficulties with social communication then, even in relatively safe relationships, harm and misunderstanding are more likely to result. Even the "nice" people are more likely to take advantage of someone who is socially naive (even if only in small ways). Thus, you are more likely to accumulate bad experiences. Indeed, it may be that the experiences of getting close to people, even relatively nice ones, are what makes one realise how dangerous it can be, rather than not getting close enough to others.

Being unable to read subtext, context etc. means that even benevolent forms of communicative manipulation (like people lying when they say they prefer hair grey to avoid upsetting someone) result in misunderstanding and confusion. You must constantly second guess other people's meanings because most of what's communicated is implicit. If someone cannot distinguish well between the more benevolent forms of lying/manipulation and the malevolent forms, they're more likely to generally mistrust people.


This is exactly my problem. How do I get close to someone or trust them when I don't know when or if I can take what they say at face value? I've had more than enough experience in getting close to people to know how things go wrong. It feels safe to be open and honest with people at the time I am doing so. It's only later that I find out it might not have been a good idea, because the other person wasn't being as honest as I was, or as honest as I thought they were.



Moondust
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2012
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,558

15 Feb 2014, 12:22 am

I find that NTs rarely utter words without having something * hidden * they want to achieve by saying those words. An agenda. Spontaneous expression seems to be rarer and rarer as people grow in age. So if you want to really know someone (and not just delude yourself by their words, as most NTs like to do), switch off the sound and watch the actions instead.


_________________
There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats - Albert Schweitzer


Ann2011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,843
Location: Ontario, Canada

15 Feb 2014, 12:26 am

I have a delayed (sometimes non-existent) understanding of sub-text. Sometimes weeks after an interaction I will suddenly understand what the conversation was really about.


_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger


dianthus
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,138

15 Feb 2014, 12:45 am

Moondust wrote:
I find that NTs rarely utter words without having something * hidden * they want to achieve by saying those words. An agenda. Spontaneous expression seems to be rarer and rarer as people grow in age. So if you want to really know someone (and not just delude yourself by their words, as most NTs like to do), switch off the sound and watch the actions instead.


That's essentially what happens when my auditory processing is distorted, it's like switching the sound off. I can see and hear that the person is talking but I can't really distinguish all the words they are saying. Maybe my brain is wired to automatically mute the sound of phoniness. :lol:



Moondust
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2012
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,558

15 Feb 2014, 12:52 am

I remember when I used to join a conversation because I overhead a question I had the answer to and the people talking didn't. I was in my late forties when I first discovered that what they were doing was mingling and bonding, not exchanging information, so they didn't appreciate my joining in the least.


_________________
There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats - Albert Schweitzer


Ann2011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,843
Location: Ontario, Canada

15 Feb 2014, 1:00 am

Haha . . . I've done that. I was an adult before I realized that it wasn't about information, but rather hierarchies and such. These days I only generally say anything if I absolutely have to. It's amazing how much silence you can get away with.


_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger


Marybird
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Apr 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,818

15 Feb 2014, 1:02 am

Ann2011 wrote:
I have a delayed (sometimes non-existent) understanding of sub-text. Sometimes weeks after an interaction I will suddenly understand what the conversation was really about.

Yeah, me too. When someone is talking to me I only hear what they are saying, as if I can't grasp that they may have an ulterior motive for saying something. I'm not quick enough to read sub-text into it, or maybe I can't listen and read sub-text at the same time, or maybe I trust people too much.
I understand the conversation better if I analyze it afterward.



Ann2011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,843
Location: Ontario, Canada

15 Feb 2014, 1:10 am

Marybird wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
I have a delayed (sometimes non-existent) understanding of sub-text. Sometimes weeks after an interaction I will suddenly understand what the conversation was really about.

Yeah, me too. When someone is talking to me I only hear what they are saying, as if I can't grasp that they may have an ulterior motive for saying something. I'm not quick enough to read sub-text into it, or maybe I can't listen and read sub-text at the same time, or maybe I trust people too much.
I understand the conversation better if I analyze it afterward.

I find it very frustrating. I know they are trying to communicate something to me that I am not getting, but it's like I can't get the context of their words. And then my mind starts filling with this buzzing and it's like I can't hear anything at all.


_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger


Marybird
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Apr 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,818

15 Feb 2014, 1:14 am

Moondust wrote:
I remember when I used to join a conversation because I overhead a question I had the answer to and the people talking didn't. I was in my late forties when I first discovered that what they were doing was mingling and bonding, not exchanging information, so they didn't appreciate my joining in the least.

8O I guess that's why people have never appreciated my information.