What are 'NTs'?

Post Reply New Topic

I've always just used the term NT for people who aren't like fitting with the social rules because of a mental disability (I hate that term too, I can't think what else to call it): for example; ASDs, AD/HD, Tourette syndrome. I personally call people who have developed a mental illness neurotypical because despite their problems, they were 'normal' at some point (except more severe mental health problems perhaps). I think that people with down syndrome are definately more like NTs, they just have learning difficulties, it doesn't affect how they interact so much (although they are often more childlike). I don't really know in great depth about this, I try not to think to hard or I get a headache...

_________________
I have HFA, ADHD, OCD & Tourette syndrome. I love animals, especially my bunnies and hamster. I skate in a roller derby team (but I'll try not to bite )

Most people use NT on this site to be people who aren't on the autistic spectrum. I think it means accurately "neurologically typical to the species." For instance, herding is very typical to the human species, so herding is a neurotypical trait that is not considered an autistic trait. But instead of describing traits, most people put it on people, like NT's have herding instinct and autistic people don't, and then people argue that you can't make generalizations about people, and nobody ends up discussing the herding instinct until someone words it less general or less offensive (as generalizations seems to also be synonymous to offensive). Either way, if we are talking what is typical to the species, normal is almost a safe synonym if people didn't read too far into it, and it wouldn't include people who have a disorder that puts them in a position to not neurologically be typical to the species (which would be almost any disorder would exclude them from that category), but generally on this site, it just means non ASD and non AS.

Humans have a herding instinct?

If you use "neurotypical" to mean "someone who does not have a mental, neurological, psychological, or otherwise exceptional mental condition", then it could easily be a plurality, not a majority. Non-NT would then include people with things like epilepsy, cultural/familial MR, synesthesia, giftedness, OCD, head injuries, or dementia. The majority of people will experience some mental or neurological condition or other off-the-norm descriptor during their lives. The majority of those will not consider themselves nontypical, though, in a sociological sense, so that the people who consider themselves atypical are probably still a minority.

Maybe we need a new word, to describe those who have both NT and Aspie traits

See, when I think of people with a herding instinct, I'm imagining us running after sheep down in pasteurs, trying to organize them together in some way.