Civet wrote:
However, it was quite obvious to me that I am not classically autistic.
Careful; Kanners or other current clinical use of the word is by no means "Classical" as the word was coined well before then! Anyone interested in the history should look up Aaron Rosanoff (I can't find his papers on the net, but there are some used books available, and anyone with access to a medical library, should be able to find his classifications). He may not have been the first to use the word, but he did describe it extensively in his categorisation of human temperament, back around the begining of the previous century.
Neither Kanner nor Asperger invented the word, as is commonly supposed, but merely used aspects of this definition. It was also used in further develoments by Humm and Wadsworth (also pre-Kanner...) who's work in turn is the basis for Chandler & Mcleod's current system of professional assessment. If this sounds familiar to some it's because this is the basis for the stripped down version of the "five minute" test that Torley posted. For PC reason's they now refer to it as A for artist, but this is a definition of autism which has a far greater claim to "classic" status, than that missused by current clinicians (thought they retain mutual relevance).
I took the full version of the above test (it takes hours...) way back in 1981, and have known since then I'm strongly autistic, but it said nothing back then about body language (though there was some mention, I believe, of poor "communication" skills or some such; but also that I'm highly skilled in use of language!) so I had no clue as to why I was being continually misunderstood, especially by my "superiors" (?). I'd read about body language some years previously, but, again, I had no suspicion of how all-pervading it was among NTs (most of whom are unaware of it themselves).
Then, I listened to a program on AS on BBC Radio 4, in 1998, where they emphasised our creativity and imagination, and above-average intelligence (yes, this is the definition used by the UK medical authorities, and quite unlike the DSM's; much closer to Attwoods usage, in fact!) and then explained at length the body language issue...and everything fell into place. I saw an exact discription of myself in their "symptoms"; but, of course, when I started looking it up on the web a few months ago, the garbage I found just confused the hell out of me, and it took months of study and deduction to come back full circle to a confident understanding of what it really means. Be careful people, much of what you'll find is misleading, and much of that, I suspect, is deliberately so; certain elements of the establishment feel threatened by the original definition of AS, and so have gone to great lengths to dilute it.
Anyway, here's the on-line test, for the newcomers; it's a bit Micky Mouse but surprisingly accurate (and at least as good as the AQ test) and if you wan't to know if you are really autistic, it's a great place to start! Don't get too hung up on exactitudes; it works best for those who go in with a relaxed attitude (and if some of you "diagnosed" Aspies find you are not autistic, then blame the DSM, not me):
http://www.wrongplanet.net/modules.php? ... opic&t=570