Page 2 of 2 [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

04 Jun 2010, 9:04 pm

LenieClarke wrote:
Another ToM thing not mentioned yet in this thread - - "... also means the person has difficulty in distinguishing whether someone's actions are intentional or accidental" - - & we would add this - - maybe the person has bad intentions towards us but there's no telling. .


I have terrible trouble with this one all the time. I cannot tell what anyones motives are.



Aimless
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2009
Age: 67
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,187

04 Jun 2010, 9:11 pm

Robdemanc wrote:
LenieClarke wrote:
Another ToM thing not mentioned yet in this thread - - "... also means the person has difficulty in distinguishing whether someone's actions are intentional or accidental" - - & we would add this - - maybe the person has bad intentions towards us but there's no telling. .


I have terrible trouble with this one all the time. I cannot tell what anyones motives are.


Me too, or whether a compliment is sincere or whether someone is just buttering me up.



Exclavius
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2010
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 632
Location: Ontario, Canada

04 Jun 2010, 10:03 pm

I have difficulty telling a person's intents, just by listening to them.
It's the reason i have problems with the banality of "please" and "thank you"
they're just words, and they don't mean anything, because you can say them so easily and not mean anything, and from the perspective of someone who can't or won't read into the words.... they're empty.

I have to judge people on their actions, When i see their actions, i can see in "how" they do them, and "why" they do them, whether they're sincere or not... at least i can do it that way far better than by listening to so empty words.

If a person tries to be as concise in their words as I am... whether for the good or bad, I do tend to give them more weight.
The quicker a reply the less i trust it.
But those are all just coping mechanisms to make up for the fact that I can't get out of people's words what NT's can get out of people's words.

I still having read this whole thread have a hard time understanding the connection between the mentioned article and the concept of ToM though. ToM would be more to do with the article than with the use of the term as throughout this thread. To me, it's not about understanding that others have a separate and distinct mind from my own, it's the source of what makes me view myself as a self-conscious individual. What the article calls an impairment... well, if it makes you less likely to ascribe things to a divine... that's a clarification.. not an impairment.
Do Aspies have less temporal lobe activity? Are we less prone to temporal lobe epilepsy? Because if the study itself is valid (ignoring the biased conclusions taken from it) then it points to a direction to look for the causes/effects of ASD's. Temporal lobes.... I think it's about time i start doing some real research on that part of the brain.



katzefrau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,835
Location: emerald city

06 Jun 2010, 1:37 am

Willard wrote:
Having impaired Theory of Mind, its easy to go through life year after year never realizing just how odd, how completely different we appear to the NTs around us. I mean, we all know in our hearts that we're not like everybody else, but I think we fool ourselves into believing we're passing for normal because we have a limited ability to see ourselves as others see us.


Willard as always has a very good perspective on this.

i might have figured out i had AS years ago if i had any intuitive way of understanding that maybe:
1. not everybody sees contrasting colors / shapes pulsing, or gets headaches from lights
2. when someone jokes with me (and i fail to understand the joke / reasoning, and get angry), it's not a deliberate affront ...
3. (see above: perpetrator of joke might actually think i'm a jerk for getting angry, rather than him/herself being the jerk)

i could go on & on .. but you get the idea.

so of course i have theory of mind .. which is an intellectual workaround.
in the heat of the moment, it's nowhere to be found.

i don't get the don't-teach-me-to-garden game or the sister in law game (from the linked thread in original post) either, and you know what? i don't care to. in the end it's better for me to steer clear of these kinds of people than try to understand that kind of illogic.

JSchoolboy wrote:
Passing for normal?


i've never quite tried.

JSchoolboy wrote:
How about passing for eccentric?


^ a much better plan, if you ask me.


_________________
Now a penguin may look very strange in a living room, but a living room looks very strange to a penguin.


nostromo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,320
Location: At Festively Plump

06 Jun 2010, 5:51 am

When someone is upset and crying my young NV Autistic son will look very sad and then cry himself, would that be his ToM not being able to differentiate himself as a separate entity from other people? Its not just the noise of it; no other noises make him cry.



MotownDangerPants
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 955

06 Jun 2010, 7:34 am

I didn't know what Theory of Mind was until 10 minutes ago. I have no comment on the higher power issue, but do they really think people on the spectrum have NO concept of other people's thoughts?

I'm definitely not a mind reader and the more I think about it I do have a lot of trouble understanding what other people are thinking if they don't tell me, but that doesn't mean I don't realize that other people have different thoughts and feelings than I do. Just because I don't know what those thoughts ARE, doesn't mean I think that everyone thinks the same way I do.

How impaired do they think Aspies are when it comes to TOM?

I'm very interested.



cosmiccat
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,504
Location: Philadelphia

06 Jun 2010, 8:01 am

Is this an example of ToM?

I went to the Customer Service counter in our grocery market to buy a lottery ticket. There were a lot of people milling around in front of the counter in no particular order that I could determine. The lottery section, with tickets and a cash register was at the left end of the counter, further up, in the middle of the counter was another cash register and a clerk behind the counter was waiting on a customer there. Two elderly female customers who appeared to be together, were standing in front of the lottery section, one kind of leaning on the counter. I asked the woman behind the counter if there were two lines or one line? She didn’t answer, either didn’t hear me, or was too busy to respond. The elderly woman who was leaning on the counter said “I’m not in line.” But that was not an answer to my question. Again I asked “Are there two lines or one?” and my question this time was directed to the group of customers. The other elderly woman said, “She’s not in line,” referring to her companion who had already told me she was not in line.

Most of the people just ignored me or shrugged their shoulders, but one woman piped up, “How can there be two lines, there is only one clerk behind the counter?” I thought that was rather a rude thing to say, and also that it lacked logic, because there was a door which leads to an office behind the customer service desk and that door was closed. I said back to her, “Well how am I supposed to know? Another clerk could have stepped into the office for a moment.” To that the woman’s eyes got big and she threw her head back a notch as if I had said something offensive to her.

By this time I was thoroughly annoyed with the whole lot of them and walked away thinking they were a bunch of idiots. All I wanted was an answer to my question; “Are there two lines or one?” In my mind, the answer to my question very simply should have been one of three, “Yes”, “No” or “I don’t know”. That’s how I would have answered that question if it was directed to me as a member of the group. Is expecting a direct answer to a direct question the same as thinking that other people think and respond the way I think and respond ? This kind of thing happens to me all the time.



bee33
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,862

06 Jun 2010, 2:13 pm

I have to admit I am very confused by all of this. When I first read about the experiment with the bears and the jellybean a while back, the only possibility that I could think of for why a kid would give the wrong answer is that as kids we are confronted by so many situations in which everyone else seems to know something we don't, so I might figure that the bear knew where the jellybean really was, because other people just seem to know these things. Since I was never tested that way as a kid, I don't know what my own answer would have been.

I know that I lack some subtle understanding of how other people think from situations I've been in. A couple of years ago I had a close group of friends online, and one of them decided she wanted to shut me out of the group, and she shunned me in this typical girl-bullying way. First she disappeared from the forum where we hung out, then I found her holding court somewhere else, and when I reacted by being terribly hurt and angry, suddenly no one was willing to talk to me anymore. I found out later that she had set me up by telling everyone that I had a problem with her and that I had been mean to her all along (which in my mind was not at all true), so that when I finally got upset, it was all the proof anyone needed of my "badness", The thing that left me completely puzzled and extremely hurt was that not one person took my side, and they all are still convinced that I am beyond the pale. I am still utterly confused about how this happened.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

06 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm

cosmiccat wrote:
Is this an example of ToM?

I went to the Customer Service counter in our grocery market to buy a lottery ticket. There were a lot of people milling around in front of the counter in no particular order that I could determine. The lottery section, with tickets and a cash register was at the left end of the counter, further up, in the middle of the counter was another cash register and a clerk behind the counter was waiting on a customer there. Two elderly female customers who appeared to be together, were standing in front of the lottery section, one kind of leaning on the counter. I asked the woman behind the counter if there were two lines or one line? She didn’t answer, either didn’t hear me, or was too busy to respond. The elderly woman who was leaning on the counter said “I’m not in line.” But that was not an answer to my question. Again I asked “Are there two lines or one?” and my question this time was directed to the group of customers. The other elderly woman said, “She’s not in line,” referring to her companion who had already told me she was not in line.

Most of the people just ignored me or shrugged their shoulders, but one woman piped up, “How can there be two lines, there is only one clerk behind the counter?” I thought that was rather a rude thing to say, and also that it lacked logic, because there was a door which leads to an office behind the customer service desk and that door was closed. I said back to her, “Well how am I supposed to know? Another clerk could have stepped into the office for a moment.” To that the woman’s eyes got big and she threw her head back a notch as if I had said something offensive to her.

By this time I was thoroughly annoyed with the whole lot of them and walked away thinking they were a bunch of idiots. All I wanted was an answer to my question; “Are there two lines or one?” In my mind, the answer to my question very simply should have been one of three, “Yes”, “No” or “I don’t know”. That’s how I would have answered that question if it was directed to me as a member of the group. Is expecting a direct answer to a direct question the same as thinking that other people think and respond the way I think and respond ? This kind of thing happens to me all the time.

That sounds familiar. I've had this kind of issue dealing with beurocrats. I can't stand it when people seemingly refuse to answer my questions and simply keep repeating themselves. I find this attitude incredibly insulting. I don't understand why it's acceptable.



cosmiccat
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,504
Location: Philadelphia

06 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm

Quoting Marshall

Quote:
That sounds familiar. I've had this kind of issue dealing with beurocrats. I can't stand it when people seemingly refuse to answer my questions and simply keep repeating themselves. I find this attitude incredibly insulting. I don't understand why it's acceptable
.

Because the majority sets the standards of what's acceptable and what's not. And also, I think, because of the herd mentality. A group of people who are also strangers don't want to stand out in the herd, or call attention to themselves, or ask too many questions because that might make them look or seem stupid and/or vulnerable. They would just prefer to act like they know what's going on instead of asking for clarification. I would venture a guess that people don't answer questions directly because they don't know the answer, but don't want to admit that they don't know the answer. These types like to waste time, their own and everyone else's. And if you are the kind of person that needs clarification to understand certain situations or actions, and persist in asking for an answer, you are seen as argumentative, a trouble maker, or a pest.



kia_williams
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 124

06 Jun 2010, 9:20 pm

I tend to have one point to make with theory of mind, at least as described in the wikipedia example. (btw Baron-Cohen has replaced the theory of mindblindness with the Empathizing-systemizing_theory )

Quote:
In the most common version of the false-belief task (often called the ‘Sally-Anne’ task), children are told or shown a story involving two characters. For example, the child is shown two dolls, Sally and Anne, who have a basket and a box, respectively. Sally also has a marble, which she places in her basket, and then leaves to take a walk. While she is out of the room, Anne takes the marble from the basket, eventually putting it in the box. Sally returns, and the child is then asked where Sally will look for the marble. The child passes the task if she answers that Sally will look in the basket, where she put the marble; the child fails the task if she answers that Sally will look in the box, where the child knows the marble is hidden, even though Sally cannot know, since she did not see it hidden there. In order to pass the task, the child must be able to understand that another’s mental representation of the situation is different from their own, and the child must be able to predict behavior based on that understanding.


AS child answer = Sally is a picture but the grown-up wants an answer about the marble!

The other one i like is that people on the spectrum if there was no theory of mind, how could we understand novels and movies to enjoy them? without a theory of mind we wouldn't be able to attribute thoughts and predict "what comes next" to what is basically talking pictures of people.



katzefrau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,835
Location: emerald city

06 Jun 2010, 10:56 pm

kia_williams wrote:
I tend to have one point to make with theory of mind, at least as described in the wikipedia example. (btw Baron-Cohen has replaced the theory of mindblindness with the Empathizing-systemizing_theory )


i like that much better.
it illustrates well that autism is marked by a different language of thought.
i like "deficits and delays in empathy combined with intact or superior systemizing" .. leaves room for a little bit of difference in the degree of deficit, also implies that systemizing can be a positive method of thought.

yeh - i'm one of those "glass half full" people ..

kia_williams wrote:
The other one i like is that people on the spectrum if there was no theory of mind, how could we understand novels and movies to enjoy them? without a theory of mind we wouldn't be able to attribute thoughts and predict "what comes next" to what is basically talking pictures of people.


to really completely lack theory of mind, wouldn't you have to be unable to recognize that other people even have minds? which is ridiculous .. that would be a sign of delusion.

Tony Attwood says of people with AS they are not quite mind blind but "mind myopic" which i also like better than the simple "mind blind" model.


_________________
Now a penguin may look very strange in a living room, but a living room looks very strange to a penguin.