TruthTree wrote:
Just FYI, it makes little 'sense' even for me as a NT.
But here's my take:
Customer: I'll pay for this chocolate candy
"Don't worry, I'll pay for this candy that I'm eating. I know I'm supposed to pay first." -- basically making sure the Cashier isn't alarmed that she might not pay for it.
Cashier: You have to. You have no choice.
Teasing the customer that she is stating the obvious, but jokingly, to assure the customer that she is not alarmed.
Customer: I like to eat chocolate. It keeps you from being mean.
She is making a half-hearted excuse/apology for eating it before paying for it. The excuse is personal, doesn't have anything to do with being mean or nice to the cashier.
She's also doing some light bonding. I presume they were both female, because chocolate is a common bonding 'girl topic' - like shoes/purses etc.
Cashier: (conciliatory remark)
Reacting to the Customer's excuse/apology, letting customer know that everything is ok and that she doesn't need to apologize.
Since you only have the written words to go by, I can see why you made this interpretation. I might not be as good as some at interpreting these sorts of things, but if I read the tension in the voices correctly, this is not the intent of the two people. BTW the customer was a female, and the cashier was a male.
I was meaning to start a discussion about this general topic rather than about this specific conversation. But thanks, everyone for contributing to this thread.
_________________
"Reality is not made of if. Reality is made of is."
-Author prefers to be anonymous.