Callista wrote:
But the AS is part of you... it's not some unwanted attachment you're carrying around. I mean, it's like saying, "That's not my cat; that's just her tail," when the tail is a part of the cat, and a very expressive part, too. (Really, they use their tails to talk; check it out next time you interact with a cat.)
When you fail because you have AS, it's not like the AS is some external thing preventing you from succeeding; it's because you tried to approach the problem while assuming that you have the same resources and abilities that NTs do. But you don't--you're autistic; and that means you are good at some things and bad at some things that the NTs aren't. If you try to solve something the NT way and then blame it on the Asperger's when you fail, you may technically be right; but it's more like, "Well, my cat failed to fetch the newspaper because she's a cat," not, "My cat failed to fetch the newspaper because she's a defective dog." If my cat wants the newspaper, she goes to the newspaper, mews at me, rubs her cheek on the paper, and makes it very plain what she wants. That's the cat way of doing things. It's not inferior to the dog way, no matter how many people think all animals should be capable of fetching newspapers. (Besides, she's a tiny seven-pound cat and not strong enough to drag the newspaper anywhere in the first place.)
Exactly. If I fail afterwards knowing that I have to take a different approach, then I'm just blaming it on the AS. It's hard to tell people this though because the NTs seem to think that I'm just blaming it on the AS.
_________________
Aspie score: 110/200, Neurotypical score: 89/200. Apparently I have Aspie and NT traits.