cyberscan wrote:
It depends upon how one looks at evolution. If evolution simply referred to change over time, then there is no conflict. If however, on uses the term evolution referring to single celled creatures turning into fish, fish turning into amphibians, amphibians turning into reptiles, reptiles into birds, birds into mammals, and eventually into humans, then there is a huge conflict.
No. There really isn't. Seriously, click the link.
Secondly, are you talking conflict specifically with Judeo-Christian beliefs or religion? Because even with an absolutely literal interpretation of religious texts, you're not going to find a conflict with all religions.
From a link off of the Wikipedia page:
Quote:
For this reason the theistic theory of evolution postulates an intervention on the part of the Creator in the production of the first organisms. When and how the first seeds of life were implanted in matter, we, indeed, do not know.
Seriously, learn about religion before you go around saying things about it. This is one of the most annoying things to me. You're not an expert on religion, you're not even an amateur theologian.
Edit: The Catholic idea of evolution is this: Species change over time and become new species as guided by the hand of God. Note that it doesn't specify which species. As in, this also applies to single celled organisms changing into multi-celled organisms, fish changing into amphibians, etc.
_________________
"Let reason be your only sovereign." ~Wizard's Sixth Rule
I'm working my way up to Attending Crazy Taoist. For now, just call me Dr. Crazy Taoist.