How similar are your interests to mine?
Moog wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
I have hardly anything in common with you, but if I may ask, why the hell are you switching back to dial up?
I could imagine going back to dial up. I mostly look at text, occasional audio files.
But how would going back to old technology help you do that? It makes no sense.
Verdandi wrote:
Puppygnu wrote:
Although I am NT my Interests are unusual. I wonder how close they are to someone on the spectrum.
I will list my favorites in no particular order.
1. Reading research articles about autism and global warming
15. I play the piano poorly. I started lessons at age 42. I will get better.
25. I dislike alcohol and bars.
26. I dislike loud environments.
I will list my favorites in no particular order.
1. Reading research articles about autism and global warming
15. I play the piano poorly. I started lessons at age 42. I will get better.
25. I dislike alcohol and bars.
26. I dislike loud environments.
Huh.
It's good to be skeptical of any research one reads, but the evidence in favor of climate change is pretty significant, and the scientific community largely considers it not controversial. The primary controversy comes from political agendas, not scientific research.
/pedant
OK, I give up! WHAT is the political agenda that causes the contraversy? Did you know that they created laws AGAINST freon, and basically made repairing them near impossible. And they came up with a replacement that couldn't be easily implemented. I bet there were TONS of freon needlessly leaked into the atmosphere. NOW, they are replacing incandescent bulbs with the flourescent that are more complicated, bad for the eyes, use more glass, and have mercury and other dangerous materials.
One guy got the NPP AND, EVEN though he clearly did NOT deserve it, flew about 7 jets, at least 1 was a 747, from washington DC to NORWAY to accept it! He flew the same trip a few times within about a month.
An engine degreaser had a banned ingredient replaced with acetone, which is itself BAD, and now dozens, perhaps THOUSANDS, are DYING from constant exposure!
And all that was done by people CLAIMING to be worried about the environment. That ONE guys trip to norway probably used more fuel than I have used in the past 30 years! SCRATCH THAT, I KNOW it did! In fact, I think it has used more fuel than ALL vehicles that transfer 20 people or less that I have been in MY ENTIRE LIFE!
Now GRANTED, I took a trip SIMILAR to the one he took ONCE, but I took it with a couple hundred OTHER people that ALSO benefitted! And MINE wasn't paid for by the US taxpayer!
BTW the "evidence" is SO tainted that no honest person could claim it is USABLE, much less meaningful.
Moog wrote:
Puppygnu wrote:
Although I am NT my Interests are unusual. I wonder how close they are to someone on the spectrum.
Are you sure you are NT?
I have a lot in common with you.
I was thinking about saying the SAME thing.
And Linux is cheaper, faster, more efficient, more compatible with standards and uses an OLD standard and is compatible with UNIX. MANY people don't use it because they learn at work, and like buying the software at the store, etc... So Linux has gotten a rep as a GEEK O/S. The average NT person isn't likely to use it.
Verdandi
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb8ef/cb8ef005d75cdea42b97eeb4ad178190128d223d" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
2ukenkerl wrote:
OK, I give up! WHAT is the political agenda that causes the contraversy? Did you know that they created laws AGAINST freon, and basically made repairing them near impossible. And they came up with a replacement that couldn't be easily implemented. I bet there were TONS of freon needlessly leaked into the atmosphere. NOW, they are replacing incandescent bulbs with the flourescent that are more complicated, bad for the eyes, use more glass, and have mercury and other dangerous materials.
The political agenda is that climate change isn't real and that we should continue on our merry way with no changes. This is economically beneficial in the short term but compounds problems in the long term.
This doesn't mean that every action taken to "protect the environment" is itself helpful. These are again political decisions.
Quote:
BTW the "evidence" is SO tainted that no honest person could claim it is USABLE, much less meaningful.
That's a radical claim. I suppose you have something other than misread e-mails to back it up?
Here: http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
http://abcnews.go.com/International/ext ... d=12610066
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8437703.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific ... ate_change
That is wikipedia, but it is extensively sourced. Read the references at the end.
Last edited by Verdandi on 06 Mar 2011, 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
2ukenkerl wrote:
Verdandi wrote:
Puppygnu wrote:
Although I am NT my Interests are unusual. I wonder how close they are to someone on the spectrum.
I will list my favorites in no particular order.
1. Reading research articles about autism and global warming
15. I play the piano poorly. I started lessons at age 42. I will get better.
25. I dislike alcohol and bars.
26. I dislike loud environments.
I will list my favorites in no particular order.
1. Reading research articles about autism and global warming
15. I play the piano poorly. I started lessons at age 42. I will get better.
25. I dislike alcohol and bars.
26. I dislike loud environments.
Huh.
It's good to be skeptical of any research one reads, but the evidence in favor of climate change is pretty significant, and the scientific community largely considers it not controversial. The primary controversy comes from political agendas, not scientific research.
/pedant
OK, I give up! WHAT is the political agenda that causes the contraversy? Did you know that they created laws AGAINST freon, and basically made repairing them near impossible. And they came up with a replacement that couldn't be easily implemented. I bet there were TONS of freon needlessly leaked into the atmosphere. NOW, they are replacing incandescent bulbs with the flourescent that are more complicated, bad for the eyes, use more glass, and have mercury and other dangerous materials.
One guy got the NPP AND, EVEN though he clearly did NOT deserve it, flew about 7 jets, at least 1 was a 747, from washington DC to NORWAY to accept it! He flew the same trip a few times within about a month.
An engine degreaser had a banned ingredient replaced with acetone, which is itself BAD, and now dozens, perhaps THOUSANDS, are DYING from constant exposure!
And all that was done by people CLAIMING to be worried about the environment. That ONE guys trip to norway probably used more fuel than I have used in the past 30 years! SCRATCH THAT, I KNOW it did! In fact, I think it has used more fuel than ALL vehicles that transfer 20 people or less that I have been in MY ENTIRE LIFE!
Now GRANTED, I took a trip SIMILAR to the one he took ONCE, but I took it with a couple hundred OTHER people that ALSO benefitted! And MINE wasn't paid for by the US taxpayer!
BTW the "evidence" is SO tainted that no honest person could claim it is USABLE, much less meaningful.
Why are you always yelling? Jesus Christ...
_________________
I live!
Moog wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
I have hardly anything in common with you, but if I may ask, why the hell are you switching back to dial up?
I could imagine going back to dial up. I mostly look at text, occasional audio files.
But it's slow.
_________________
-Allie
Canadian, young adult, student demisexual-heteroromantic, cisgender female, autistic
Asp-Z wrote:
Moog wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
I have hardly anything in common with you, but if I may ask, why the hell are you switching back to dial up?
I could imagine going back to dial up. I mostly look at text, occasional audio files.
But how would going back to old technology help you do that? It makes no sense.
No point paying for broadband going unused.
Dial up's probably not any cheaper though. I have no idea. I can imagine circumstances when there would be valid reasons to go with the S rather than the XL option. Whether they are real or not is for other people to decide, like puppygnu.
I wouldn't have any use for a Ferrari either.
_________________
Not currently a moderator
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
neurotypical and tech special interests |
12 Dec 2024, 2:15 pm |
Shared special interests is nice |
06 Jan 2025, 4:50 am |