Page 2 of 2 [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

ChekaMan
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 184
Location: Whitstable,UK

23 May 2011, 9:30 am

Up to a point,yes;-I don't think countries should be dictatorships, but I also think most murderers deserve to be executed.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

23 May 2011, 9:43 am

Sociopaths have a short-term advantage, compassion and concern for fairness win in the long run. The Arab Spring took a long time in coming, and will probably still see some backsliding, but they've moved the battle lines in the right direction. I've just been reminded of some of the awful things civil rights leaders said about women's rights, despite that they'd never have made the progress they did without the women involved.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 69,232
Location: Over there

23 May 2011, 11:22 am

wavefreak58 wrote:
Cornflake wrote:
2ukenkerl wrote:
It's like the "gay rights" agenda. If they had all rights of marriage, then why shouldn't TRADITIONAL partners?
1. There is no "agenda".
.
There is always an agenda. Sometimes the agenda is a worthy one. Sometimes it is not. Were there no agenda then there would be no effort to induce change.
Well, I guess - but when used in this context, emotive nonsense like "Gay mafia" usually isn't too far away. :wink:


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

23 May 2011, 12:15 pm

jrjones9933 wrote:
Sociopaths have a short-term advantage, compassion and concern for fairness win in the long run. The Arab Spring took a long time in coming, and will probably still see some backsliding, but they've moved the battle lines in the right direction. I've just been reminded of some of the awful things civil rights leaders said about women's rights, despite that they'd never have made the progress they did without the women involved.
I just can't imagine living life as a sociopath. Sure, you might get some things you wanted if you could take advantage of other people without worrying about having a conscience about it; but it'd be a horribly empty kind of life. You'd be forever chasing after the next bit of pleasure, just running out the clock on your life without ever leaving anything behind or building a better world for anybody else. There'd be no purpose to it, no goal, just marking the time until your funeral. Compared to having a meaningful life, pleasure is worthless.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


Jediscraps
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 522

23 May 2011, 12:24 pm

If you mean rights as in expanding individual autonomy/freedom, fairness and integrity, I'd say these rights come from people who were dominated. oppressed or treated unfarily in some way. and so fought in the name of their own "humanity". I think these rights become "self evident" from creating a dichotomy of lower and higher values, the higher values being appealed to, against the lower values of the world as it is/was.

(I think it took me a half hour or so, maybe longer, to write these two sentences....ha)



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

23 May 2011, 8:07 pm

I don't believe in "inherent rights" if that's what you mean.

I believe "rights" are determined by whatever society happens to be in the business of defining them at any given time. If "rights" have an objective existence rooted outside of the human mind, I haven't figured it out yet.

As for non-human animals, I believe in "animal welfare," but not "animal rights."


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,084

24 May 2011, 4:21 am

Callista wrote:
jrjones9933 wrote:
Sociopaths have a short-term advantage, compassion and concern for fairness win in the long run. The Arab Spring took a long time in coming, and will probably still see some backsliding, but they've moved the battle lines in the right direction. I've just been reminded of some of the awful things civil rights leaders said about women's rights, despite that they'd never have made the progress they did without the women involved.
I just can't imagine living life as a sociopath. Sure, you might get some things you wanted if you could take advantage of other people without worrying about having a conscience about it; but it'd be a horribly empty kind of life. You'd be forever chasing after the next bit of pleasure, just running out the clock on your life without ever leaving anything behind or building a better world for anybody else. There'd be no purpose to it, no goal, just marking the time until your funeral. Compared to having a meaningful life, pleasure is worthless.

Hmmm.........personally I think that enlightened selfishness is as altruistic as it usually gets for humans. I can't easily inagine not caring about others, but it might be a different matter if I were absolutely sure that there'd be no comeback for disregarding them. Though I'm one of those unfortunates who was brought up with too much conscience, so unbridled hedonism always does look like a step up from just making sure I don't upset anybody. Problem is that I can't imagine what it would be like not to need friends, and I can't have friends unless I care about them, at least not friends in the sense that I mean. Cronies yes, friends no.



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

24 May 2011, 5:48 am

Quote:
I can't easily inagine not caring about others, but it might be a different matter if I were absolutely sure that there'd be no comeback for disregarding them.
Then you'd have to erase your own memory. YOU would know, and that's more punishment than anything that might happen to you.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

24 May 2011, 8:30 am

JohnyJohn wrote:
Do you?Or is it my idea that everyone likes to be a Hitler/Stalin and it is?Law of the Jungle/Chaos?What is the gain?Am i just confused?


Yes. You have not stated a question clearly. Organize your thoughts and try again.

ruveyn



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,084

24 May 2011, 9:11 am

Callista wrote:
Quote:
I can't easily inagine not caring about others, but it might be a different matter if I were absolutely sure that there'd be no comeback for disregarding them.
Then you'd have to erase your own memory. YOU would know, and that's more punishment than anything that might happen to you.

Conceptually it feels like I might be able to learn not to care, but I don't suppose in practice the leopard can change his spots. Can't even use the "they deserved it" rationalisation that most people seem to, because I know that for the hype it is. I'd make a lousy executioner. :(



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

24 May 2011, 9:42 am

And you're sad about that? It's a good thing to care about people.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,084

24 May 2011, 10:05 am

Callista wrote:
And you're sad about that? It's a good thing to care about people.

Well, like I said, some people have too much conscience. I'm not really sad about my inner reluctance to kill (though it could be a disadvantage in some scenarios).....it's more the lesser acts of aggression that I wish I could be a little more comfy about.



Keeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2006
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,875
Location: Earth

24 May 2011, 10:23 am

I believe unequivocally in human rights, except for where they impinge negatively on someone else's.



wavefreak58
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,419
Location: Western New York

24 May 2011, 10:27 am

Cornflake wrote:
wavefreak58 wrote:
Cornflake wrote:
2ukenkerl wrote:
It's like the "gay rights" agenda. If they had all rights of marriage, then why shouldn't TRADITIONAL partners?
1. There is no "agenda".
.
There is always an agenda. Sometimes the agenda is a worthy one. Sometimes it is not. Were there no agenda then there would be no effort to induce change.
Well, I guess - but when used in this context, emotive nonsense like "Gay mafia" usually isn't too far away. :wink:


Yeah. The word 'agenda' has taken on a decidedly negative tone. Agendas are conspiratorial and nefarious. Revolutions are righteous. It is not an agenda to promote equal right, it is something more than that.

Whatever. It's all promotion of the the ideas a specific group believes in.


_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.


Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

25 May 2011, 9:45 am

ToughDiamond wrote:
Callista wrote:
And you're sad about that? It's a good thing to care about people.

Well, like I said, some people have too much conscience. I'm not really sad about my inner reluctance to kill (though it could be a disadvantage in some scenarios).....it's more the lesser acts of aggression that I wish I could be a little more comfy about.
Don't be. You don't want to stop caring--ever. Even if you do pay for it in guilt sometimes, it's worth it.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,084

25 May 2011, 10:00 am

Callista wrote:
ToughDiamond wrote:
Callista wrote:
And you're sad about that? It's a good thing to care about people.

Well, like I said, some people have too much conscience. I'm not really sad about my inner reluctance to kill (though it could be a disadvantage in some scenarios).....it's more the lesser acts of aggression that I wish I could be a little more comfy about.
Don't be. You don't want to stop caring--ever. Even if you do pay for it in guilt sometimes, it's worth it.

I don't know.......I've seen situations........there was this scientist taking the mickey out of another scientist's work - he actually played a tune on his test tubes with a pair of glass pipettes - a quick smack on the culprit's head with a roll of laboratory sealing film soon resolved the problem. I would have still been thinking "have I the right.....?"