Nanotechnology to treat Autism? My theory of best way to tre

Page 2 of 2 [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

03 Aug 2011, 1:03 pm

People assume nanobots could be hacked but that doesn't mean it will be possible. The living part of the nanobot might program itself making it less susceptible to attack. Nanotechnology and hacking do not go hand in hand.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,924
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

03 Aug 2011, 1:31 pm

Panic wrote:
Nanotechnology to treat Autism? My theory of best way to treat autism and asd maybe a golden small robot that is surgically put into the language section of the brain and the pre-frontal cortex and it sends out small electric waves to stimulate the neurons to make them grow or stimulate.

What do you guys think?

I dont know the math of electronics behind it but this seems like its pretty plausible.

I am just wondering all the millions of dollars that go to autism research, how about we stop spending money on useless research because as it is obvious, these scientist are getting absolutely NOWHERE, its all ways the same bull sh*t answers.

"Autism might be genetic"

"We dont know if autism is started by vaccines"

Autism is the most horse sh*t field of study out there.


I don't like that idea, I do not want some device in my head to try and alter how my brain works to make me more 'normal' that would not be me that would be some little robot controlling me which kinda freaks me out...but if someone consents to that they can have at it......I am just not intrested.

Also there are pleanty of other mental disorders/conditions that they have not found one direct cause for....as a rule a lot of things are biologically and environmentally influenced so with most they cannot say exactly what causes it. does not nessisarly make the study of mental disorders a horse sh*t feild of study.



aspie48
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: up s**t creek with a fan as a paddle

03 Aug 2011, 1:36 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
If Macs and Smartphones can be made hackproof so can a nanobot. The key is not to involve any servers but satellites and nanobot towers instead. This will save the nanobot dynasty from extinction.

I'm fairly sure Macs and Smartphones aren't hackproof. It's just nobody bothers hacking Macs because nobody uses them, just like few people bother creating viruses for Macs because with a little extra effort you can create a virus capable of infecting nine times more machines. We're all aware of the hacking of people's answering machines, some of which were presumably accessed via smartphones, and they can be jailbroken.

The thing to do would be to only give them simple functions. The ones that fight cancer could only be able to identify cancerous cells and release their medicine once they had done so, for example. One cannot hack a television, or a car, as the electronics are so simple (compared to a computer).

bluemountain trojan hacked into mac despite what mac said...



wavefreak58
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,419
Location: Western New York

03 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm

Nana-technology?

Image


_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.