Artros wrote:
Nobody's saying it's "basically the same thing." People are saying that everyone has some symptoms (or genes or whatever) which are also included in autism.
I guarantee you that you will find no one who scores completely NT on the various online tests (the AQ test and the big RDOS Aspie test). While these may not be the be all, end all of diagnostic tools, they still measure a number of symptoms which correlate to AS. The NT average on the AQ test is 16, if I remember correctly. That means that really, everyone is a little bit autistic. That they do not suffer from it so much does not mean that they cannot relate to some of the issues.
There is a difference between objective placement on a spectrum based on assessment instruments and the flippant "Everyone is a little autistic" attitude that crops up with all too much frequency. If someone uses that particular phrase as a way of marginalizing the very real symptoms of someone with autism, it is only showing ignorance and is offensive.
Clearly, from a clinicians view, everyone has a range of behaviors, some of which correlate to some degree to the criteria of the DSM/ICD definitions of autism. So, while sloppy, it isn't inaccurate to suggest that everyone displays bits of autism. But clinically, mildly manifesting a few autistic like traits is NOT the same as being autistic. The intellectually lazy will fall back to the "Everyone has it to some degree" rubric simply because they haven't the desire to become informed and would rather be dismissive. Becoming informed requires effort and carries risk of change. It is easier for far too many to persist in false ideas than change them.
_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.