diagnosis and "permission to injure"
Also, I am more comfortable being the true autistic me wherever I am now; however, I never thought it was okay to intentionally emotionally injure someone. Sometimes it happens without me realizing it, but that has always been the case. While most of the time I cannot understand why people are "injured" if I say something to them, I still feel bad if I hurt people's feelings. So I don't feel like a diagnosis (either when I was self-dx or now that I am professionally dx) gives me permission to treat people poorly.
_________________
Diagnosed with classic Autism
AQ score= 48
PDD assessment score= 170 (severe PDD)
EQ=8 SQ=93 (Extreme Systemizer)
Alexithymia Quiz=164/185 (high)
ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw
guywithAS wrote:
thanks for the posts guys.
as i see people self diagnose with aspergers, i get the feeling in many ways it is to gain this "permission to injure". they no longer have to make extra effort in social interactions because there is a built in excuse.
if you're self diagnosed -- or even professionally diagnosed (like i was), i'd encourage you to be careful about how you handle this. just because they say we don't have empathy doesn't mean we have to act that way.
as i see people self diagnose with aspergers, i get the feeling in many ways it is to gain this "permission to injure". they no longer have to make extra effort in social interactions because there is a built in excuse.
if you're self diagnosed -- or even professionally diagnosed (like i was), i'd encourage you to be careful about how you handle this. just because they say we don't have empathy doesn't mean we have to act that way.
"They" never seem to say that NT's have no empathy towards US, which is quite-often the case.
It's hard for anyone to empathize with someone who has a radically-different way of being-
Autistics shouldn't be expected to "act" by virtue of being not in the neuro-majority.
For those of us who are self-diagnosed (I was, prior to seeing a psychologist) it wasn't really a "choice" on our part.
We simply recognized that we met the criteria (an apparent lack of empathy not being one).
_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."
Quote:
as i see people self diagnose with aspergers, i get the feeling in many ways it is to gain this "permission to injure". they no longer have to make extra effort in social interactions because there is a built in excuse.
That's assuming that the extra effort in social interactions is needed to avoid "injury" as opposed to avoiding being looked at funny.
Some social rules are necessary to keep interactions from degenerating into conflict. Others are just there because most people are used to them. One thing we have to learn is how to tell the difference so that we can direct our "fitting in" efforts where there's the most payoff.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
‘Multiple Shooters’ kill 4 injure 17 in Birmingham, Ala |
23 Sep 2024, 11:35 am |
New diagnosis, and new here. |
08 Oct 2024, 8:17 pm |
Diagnosis; what to expect. |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm |
Diagnosis; what to expect. |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm |