gender confusion
I have no such confusion, and I have AS.
That's in no way contradictory to what he claimed. He never made the claim that all, or even most AS individuals are transgender, just that a larger percentage of AS individuals are transgender than NT individuals, so the fact that you posses no apparent degree of gender dysphoria has no bearing on this argument. Nobody ever claimed causation either. And as for a link, I believe someone else already provided that.
As for myself, I don't feel that I'm the opposite gender psychologically, but I don't feel particularly attached to my biological gender either. I guess I'm more gender apathetic than anything else.
I have no such confusion, and I have AS.
That's in no way contradictory to what he claimed. He never made the claim that all, or even most AS individuals are transgender, just that a larger percentage of AS individuals are transgender than NT individuals, so the fact that you posses no apparent degree of gender dysphoria has no bearing on this argument. Nobody ever claimed causation either. And as for a link, I believe someone else already provided that.
As for myself, I don't feel that I'm the opposite gender psychologically, but I don't feel particularly attached to my biological gender either. I guess I'm more gender apathetic than anything else.
What is in no way contradictory to what who claimed? I don't know what you mean by "That's" or "what" he claimed, or who "he" is. Who and what are you referring to?
If you were addressing me, and my reply to Fnord's claim,
By definition that is incorrect. Correlation by definition is not coincidental. His own quote from Merriam-Webster bears that out.
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...
I have no such confusion, and I have AS.
That's in no way contradictory to what he claimed. He never made the claim that all, or even most AS individuals are transgender, just that a larger percentage of AS individuals are transgender than NT individuals, so the fact that you posses no apparent degree of gender dysphoria has no bearing on this argument. Nobody ever claimed causation either. And as for a link, I believe someone else already provided that.
As for myself, I don't feel that I'm the opposite gender psychologically, but I don't feel particularly attached to my biological gender either. I guess I'm more gender apathetic than anything else.
What is in no way contradictory to what who claimed? I don't know what you mean by "That's" or "what" he claimed, or who "he" is. Who and what are you referring to?
If you were addressing me, and my reply to Fnord's claim,
By definition that is incorrect. Correlation by definition is not coincidental. His own quote from Merriam-Webster bears that out.
I was stating that the fact that he isn't "confused" is not contradictory to your claim that there is a correlation between AS and transgender...
Sorry man. I was only addressing the Correlation issue. Statistics just happen to be one of my side interests so that caught my eye. I know of no study, and the actual topic here doesn't really interest me enough to go any further.
I believe Verdandi posted some relevant links on the first page of this thread, but no idea if they're what your asking for.
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
I already posted links to it. In the past, your response to those links was way off base:
No.
6% is practically nothing, as it is well below the level of simple random chance (50%).
60% would be significant, however...
This alludes to previous research but is really a case study: http://galileoace.com/Docs/GID_ASD.pdf
This study is relevant but despite its age is apparently not freely available or I'm misreading something:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... x/abstract
It seems to me that if autism impacts gender identity, than a relationship between being gender variant in some way (not just transgender) and being autistic is practically unavoidable.
Association, yeah. Correlation just means that the two things occur together; there's no way to tell if there's a cause and effect relationship, and if so, which way it goes.
You can say "Autistic people are more likely to be transgendered."
But you can't say, "Autism causes gender dysphoria."
6% isn't "nothing". The general population is on the Spectrum at a rate of 1:100. The transgendered population is on the Spectrum at a rate of 1:17. Depending on the sample size (and it wouldn't need to be a very big sample size, either), it is very likely a significant difference. Actually, my statistics-oriented brain just did the numbers and came up with a sample size of 16... If you found that extreme a difference in that sample, you could say with 95% confidence that a higher proportion of transgendered people are autistic.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,907
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Correlation = Coincidence
I'd like to see someone else provide a link to some real, vetted research on this subject.
Actually correlation does not = coincidence.....
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
gender confusion |
21 Nov 2024, 6:34 pm |
Bill addressing diagnosis gender disparity |
31 Aug 2024, 8:39 am |