Verdandi wrote:
I'm not sure why you find the idea difficult or impossible to accept, since autism is apparently primarily genetic, and has at least been associated with statistically significant higher occurrence of particular physical features.
That doesn't mean that every physical feature someone thinks is related to being autistic is, but it doesn't mean that there's no truth to it either. A black or white, it must either be THIS or THAT isn't necessary to be skeptical.
Also, autism is associated with certain kinds of visible behavior, such as stimming, flat affect (no facial expression), odd gait and posture and such that even if you don't have any physical features associated with autism, you're likely to be visibly identifiable unless you lack most or all of those traits (entirely possible) or have learned to conceal them (entirely possible).
Right.
But I'm just saying that if there are any physical features, they aren't be unique to Autism because they seem common in the general population, for example, big eyes. I don't have big eyes myself, but I know a lot of NTs with big eyes. I've got 4 people in my family with big eyes and they're all NTs. And also with earlobes, mine aren't right attached to my head, but everybody's earlobes are different anyway. Some stick out, others are more attached, others are just in between.
If I looked at somebody with Down's Syndrome, I know right away that they have Down's Syndrome by their physical look. But if I met another Aspie, I probably wouldn't know just by looking at them, unless they stimmed or something. There's a boy who gets on my bus, and every time he gets on he almost runs to his seat, and sometimes I think that perhaps he's on the spectrum, but then I sometimes get doubts. He might not be. I don't know him. But he could be, judging the way he kind of moves, but there's still a chance he might not be. He might have some other disorder, or might just be that way.
_________________
Female