Page 2 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Are self diagnosed people welcome
yes 90%  90%  [ 82 ]
no 10%  10%  [ 9 ]
Total votes : 91

OddDuckNash99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,562

01 Jan 2012, 6:05 pm

The only thing I have against a self-diagnosis is when a person self-diagnoses themself with AS but never needs to seek professional help, be it therapy or medication or whatever. All DSM diagnoses specifically say that the symptoms/diagnoses must cause "significant impairment in functioning." If someone thinks they have AS but doesn't need accommodations of any sort and can live their lives without seeking some kind of diagnosis, how is that really an AS diagnosis? (This excludes cases where a person cannot afford to seek an official diagnosis, of course.) It's not impeding on their life enough to cause significant problems. I'm all for self-diagnosis as a starting point. I correctly self-diagnosed myself with OCD about a year-and-a-half before I received an official diagnosis, but I needed to pursue an official diagnosis to get the help I need to live a somewhat "normal" life. AS is debilitating in many aspects, and I've heard many tales of self-diagnosis that only show Aspie traits or being part of the BAP rather than the full-blown condition.


_________________
Helinger: Now, what do you see, John?
Nash: Recognition...
Helinger: Well, try seeing accomplishment!
Nash: Is there a difference?


Guineapigged
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 412
Location: UK

01 Jan 2012, 6:15 pm

OddDuckNash99 wrote:
The only thing I have against a self-diagnosis is when a person self-diagnoses themself with AS but never needs to seek professional help, be it therapy or medication or whatever. All DSM diagnoses specifically say that the symptoms/diagnoses must cause "significant impairment in functioning." If someone thinks they have AS but doesn't need accommodations of any sort and can live their lives without seeking some kind of diagnosis, how is that really an AS diagnosis? (This excludes cases where a person cannot afford to seek an official diagnosis, of course.)


This is exactly the point I was trying to make in a previous thread of mine (about self-diagnosis), but it was met with a lot of hostility and resistance.
Something I fail to understand is how so many people on WP can be in denial about the fact that AS is a disorder. In order for it to be diagnosed, it has to significantly impair your day-to-day life. But Lord help you if you ever dare call it a "disability" - it's not a view that's exactly welcomed, for reasons that continue to escape me. :?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,896
Location: Stendec

01 Jan 2012, 6:31 pm

Of course those who "Diagnose" themselves are welcome!

A person's beliefs should have no bearing on his or her eligibility for membership.



nemorosa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,121
Location: Amongst the leaves.

01 Jan 2012, 6:41 pm

Fnord wrote:
Of course those who "Diagnose" themselves are welcome!

A person's beliefs should have no bearing on his or her eligibility for membership.


Just like so many have "belief" in their "Doctor". All welcome.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,896
Location: Stendec

01 Jan 2012, 6:43 pm

nemorosa wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Of course those who "Diagnose" themselves are welcome! A person's beliefs should have no bearing on his or her eligibility for membership.
Just like so many have "belief" in their "Doctor". All welcome.

At least belief in medical science is firmly based in objective reality.



Ambivalence
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,613
Location: Peterlee (for Industry)

01 Jan 2012, 6:44 pm

I hope we can all agree that the really important question is whether un-diagnosed, with hyphen is distinct from undiagnosed, without. I think of the former as implying someone who was diagnosed but now isn't, and the latter of implying someone who has never been diagnosed. (No offence intended to the OP, who is whole-heartedly welcome as far as this snarky pedant is concerned. :) )

guinea wrote:
Something I fail to understand is how so many people on WP can be in denial about the fact that AS is a disorder. In order for it to be diagnosed, it has to significantly impair your day-to-day life. But Lord help you if you ever dare call it a "disability" - it's not a view that's exactly welcomed, for reasons that continue to escape me.

It's one of those "road to hell" things. (Yeah, yeah, flagrant use of metaphoric language, sue me.) There's a general historic association between "disabled person" and "person to be discriminated against/marginalised/generally picked on and not treated seriously" and so to prevent or disown that association people don't acknowledge that a disability exists. Stupid but at least well-intentioned.


_________________
No one has gone missing or died.

The year is still young.


nemorosa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,121
Location: Amongst the leaves.

01 Jan 2012, 6:47 pm

Fnord wrote:
nemorosa wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Of course those who "Diagnose" themselves are welcome! A person's beliefs should have no bearing on his or her eligibility for membership.
Just like so many have "belief" in their "Doctor". All welcome.

At least belief in medical science is firmly based in objective reality.


Well no actually. The psychiatrist says "you don't have aspergers because you've indicated you care about your family". How is that medical science based in objective reality?



LeafPass
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 8

01 Jan 2012, 6:58 pm

Joe90 wrote:
Anybody's welcome here. I don't see why self-diagnosed Aspies can't be welcome here. It'd be like saying men aren't welcome in women's clothes shops. Men can go in women's clothes shops if they like, maybe to work there, or look for something for his daughter or wife or sister or whatever, all sorts of reasons.

Mind you, they tend to get funny looks if they ask to on try that skimpy dress they've found... ;)

Anyway, as far as I'm aware, this place isn't some sort of exclusive club with limited access for those without a doctor-signed membership card, so it shouldn't matter who posts here as long as they're not here to cause trouble.

(edited before somebody collars me for ending a sentence on a preposition)


_________________
My anger is a form of madness, so I'd rather have hope than sadness.

I make music: http://rossbakermusic.co.uk


hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

01 Jan 2012, 7:36 pm

OddDuckNash99 wrote:
The only thing I have against a self-diagnosis is when a person self-diagnoses themself with AS but never needs to seek professional help, be it therapy or medication or whatever. All DSM diagnoses specifically say that the symptoms/diagnoses must cause "significant impairment in functioning." If someone thinks they have AS but doesn't need accommodations of any sort and can live their lives without seeking some kind of diagnosis, how is that really an AS diagnosis? (This excludes cases where a person cannot afford to seek an official diagnosis, of course.)


Whatever is wrong with me causes me a lot of impairment in functioning, so much that I feel too impaired to even get help on my own. However I'm one of the ones that have no money or insurance to even try to get any diagnosis.

There are occasional posters on here that make me feel like since I don't have an official diagnosis I just shouldn't be here.



noname_ever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 500
Location: Indiana

01 Jan 2012, 7:36 pm

OddDuckNash99 wrote:
The only thing I have against a self-diagnosis is when a person self-diagnoses themself with AS but never needs to seek professional help, be it therapy or medication or whatever. All DSM diagnoses specifically say that the symptoms/diagnoses must cause "significant impairment in functioning." If someone thinks they have AS but doesn't need accommodations of any sort and can live their lives without seeking some kind of diagnosis, how is that really an AS diagnosis? (This excludes cases where a person cannot afford to seek an official diagnosis, of course.) It's not impeding on their life enough to cause significant problems. I'm all for self-diagnosis as a starting point. I correctly self-diagnosed myself with OCD about a year-and-a-half before I received an official diagnosis, but I needed to pursue an official diagnosis to get the help I need to live a somewhat "normal" life. AS is debilitating in many aspects, and I've heard many tales of self-diagnosis that only show Aspie traits or being part of the BAP rather than the full-blown condition.


You can have it impact your life without it destroying your life. I am able to hold a job and make a decent salary as long as I limit my mangerial responsibiities (I hate those, would rather stay technical). However, if I can't function socially on a date or have sufficient social skills to get laid using craigslist, it does impact my life.



iceveela
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 438

01 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm

I am self-diagnosed, and I know that I am not welcome here by a few people as if my self-diagnosing myself makes other people less of a aspie...

I would love to get a real diagnosis, but lack of money, and a family who thinks that I am delusional, prevents me from doing so. I do not think I am a aspie solely due to a few social issues..., granted I do have a lot of social issues and at the same time don't really seem to care about them. I fit the glove called Aspergers. I found people who I can relate to, and I feel happy about not being the only person who feels like they came from kepler 22b.

I really do not see what some peoples issue is... I mean, I am not going to use aspergers as a excuse for not doing something, or to get benefits, or as a excuse to be blunt and mean to people. The same reason I did not use gender Identity Disorder for them same things. I feel like I belong. so I would like to stay without provocation.


_________________
Aspie score: 164/200
NT score: 60/200
You are very likely an Aspie!

AQ: 36


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,896
Location: Stendec

01 Jan 2012, 8:00 pm

iceveela wrote:
I am self-diagnosed, and I know that I am not welcome here by a few people as if my self-diagnosing myself makes other people less of a aspie...

A self-diagnosis does not make someone any less an Aspie; not being an Aspie does, however...



iceveela
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 438

01 Jan 2012, 8:17 pm

Fnord wrote:
iceveela wrote:
I am self-diagnosed, and I know that I am not welcome here by a few people as if my self-diagnosing myself makes other people less of a aspie...

A self-diagnosis does not make someone any less an Aspie; not being an Aspie does, however...


But I think even if someone is not a aspie but believes they are, they should be able to stay here and talk about their issues without fear of provocation. I am not going to toss someone out or throw them under the bus in the LGBT community just because they were experimenting as a teenager and for some reason believes that makes them a pure homosexual, Or they are a guy who likes to wear female tennis shoes so they believe that makes them transgender...


_________________
Aspie score: 164/200
NT score: 60/200
You are very likely an Aspie!

AQ: 36


Eloa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,223

01 Jan 2012, 8:22 pm

Fnord wrote:
iceveela wrote:
I am self-diagnosed, and I know that I am not welcome here by a few people as if my self-diagnosing myself makes other people less of a aspie...

A self-diagnosis does not make someone any less an Aspie; not being an Aspie does, however...

Why should people relate to the issues of autism and Asperger's so much and write many posts, where the diagnosed also relate to and go into conversation with, if they are not on the spectrum at all? (exceptions for people with a family-member on the spectrum for information). Then they should be at least obsessed with it. I guess, that people who don't relate to ASD at all would not even write here, at least not for a long time. Like there are a million of forums I don't relate to and would never write in. There was this forum about depression I was reading in and though having been depressed, I could not relate to the people, because...well, they were not autistic and had different ways of writing and "bounding" with each other and perception and they had too complicated Emoticons, that I couldn't understand the coherence of the written text anymore and an excessive use of Emoticons and were excessively talking about "how they feel" and relations and stuff, I could not relate to. So I stopped reading there.


_________________
English is not my native language, so I will very likely do mistakes in writing or understanding. My edits are due to corrections of mistakes, which I sometimes recognize just after submitting a text.


Last edited by Eloa on 01 Jan 2012, 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

iceveela
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 438

01 Jan 2012, 8:23 pm

I find it kinda funny that Aspergers is a minority, yet a few of its members are trying to make it a member exclusive club and toss out people who they believe are not fit to hold the title "aspie"

It kinda reminds me of "Sparta" or the Eugenics movement of the 1920's...


_________________
Aspie score: 164/200
NT score: 60/200
You are very likely an Aspie!

AQ: 36


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,896
Location: Stendec

01 Jan 2012, 8:24 pm

iceveela wrote:
Fnord wrote:
iceveela wrote:
I am self-diagnosed, and I know that I am not welcome here by a few people as if my self-diagnosing myself makes other people less of a aspie...

A self-diagnosis does not make someone any less an Aspie; not being an Aspie does, however...


But I think even if someone is not a aspie but believes they are, they should be able to stay here and talk about their issues without fear of provocation...

One more time, for those who did not read it before...

Fnord wrote:
Of course those who "Diagnose" themselves are welcome! A person's beliefs should have no bearing on his or her eligibility for membership.

Whether or not you have an objective, valid and official diagnosis of AS/ASD, you are welcome here.