Objectophilia

Post Reply New Topic

I have seen that show and found it odd and funny. Not that I am against it, I have never heard of it so it was all very strange to me and I found it funny. Funny enough, I once talked about having sex with Spokane and wanting to hump the buildings that were in Benny & Joon but I got talked out of it. Then I see this show and I knew they were more extreme than I was and I didn't have a building fetish.

There are lot of things out there I find strange but that doesn't mean I am bigoted about it and against it. Lot of people find what I like doing strange and some call me sick and disgusting for it (even from my own mother) but I don't let it bother me anymore. There are things some people like doing with it I find sick and disgusting but to each their own. They are not hurting anyone as they do it so what's the problem? As a matter of fact, it seems like now people are starting to open up to it meaning they are not going to judge people who do it and not hate them for it but that doesn't mean they will participate in it or try it or want to be in a relationship with someone who does it.

It was shown in a video where Erika was talking about being discharge from the Air Force for psychological reasons, but I have to watch the video ago to see if she talks about the sword. There are blogs that speaks of her sword and how it got her discharged. Erika had a right to defend herself, but maybe not to that extent though some man tried to rape her. If I was in her position, however, and had a sword I wouldn't hesitate to use it if some creep tried to rape me. Like some of the others with Autism and Aspergers her sexuality is in overdrive and will have sex with the very objects she has fallen in love with. She has had a number of them. Right now it is 2 big beautiful construction crane diecast models.

I'm hoping someday that those who try to act normal saying that objectum sexuality is normal, will concentrate on their Autism, Aspergers and other psychological problems which would include their many traits, talents and skills. Objectophilia is only one trait which is less important in some of us than in others. This particular trait is pretty much down on my list of traits.

Strange coming from you to say that objectophilia is strange. And because I'm also strange and have gone through the same things that you went through, I don't find this strange at all. I just see it as just one of my traits that I call objectophilia.

Also, you should have done some research before calling objectophilia a fetish which it is not. Here is what Wikipedia say about objectum sexuality in this case:

Contrary to sexual fetishism, the object to an OS person is viewed as their partner and not as a means to an end to enhance a human sexual relationship.

Now do you see the difference? Just remember, we are all in the same boat but most of us here on WP has our priorities right when it comes to Aspergers, Autism and other pyschological problems because we talk about our many traits, skills and talents. This is the main reason I started this topic so I can learn more from the other members.

expensive european cars

The way you originally presented it made it sound like she just attacked someone with a sword. Now you say she was defending herself from rape. Why would they discharge her for defending herself from rape? I'm just not following you so I'm going to leave it at that.

Sorry, that I didn't mention why she used the sword in my first post. Basically she did attack this guy with the sword but had a good reason. And that is what the blogs are saying too. She wasn't discharge for defending herself, they discharged her because she wouldn't get rid of the sword after that happened, since it was her lover and partner.

If I confused anyone on the sword situation, I hope my last post clears this up. There was a lot involved with Erika's sword.

GOT IT RIGHT THIS TIME in my last post. I watched the video. I just like to add that Erika has Chronic Post Traumatic Stress Disorder because of the bad things that went on in her childhood. She was diagnosed by an Air Force Psychiatrist after she refused to give up her sword.

Isn't a fetish an attachment to a object and in that show called 'I married the Eiffel Tower" they were sexually turned on by building structures and one of them was sexually attracted to a ride and one of them actually married the Berlin Wall and they made out to them?

I don't understand why people take offense to the word because what is wrong with it? What is wrong with having a fetish? People act like its a bad thing so they take offense to it when they are told they have one or when it gets called that. Plus it doesn't always have to be sexual. I have known couple people on the spectrum who say they have a fetish for something even though one of them is not turned on by it. I have one friend who likes ducks (I dunno if we still are friends because we had a disagreement about something on a forum) and she says she has a duck fetish even though she is not turned on by them. Then I have another friend who likes children's shoes and longalls and he masturbates to them and all and rubs them against his face. He calls it his fetish. I don't remember if he has said if it's sexual for him or not but I think if you have to masturbate to it, then it must be. But of course I think there is a difference between masturbating with something because it turns you on and using something else to masturbate with because you like to use anything between your legs to rub and it's not that object you are using that turns you on, it's the rubbing and the feeling inside you when you masturbate and you have to use something to do it.

The only way that would be a fetish if they used their objects to sexually arouse themselves enough so they can finish with a human partner. But, since the object is the the only partner with no other humans involved than it is an objectophila or objectum sexuality. I hear too many people, especially those that should know better call object love a fetish when it is not. Please look up Objectum Sexuality Internationale and it will also tell you what objectum sexuality is. I never did call it a fetish since there were no other human involved, whether they were buildings, rides, shoes, etc.

As for your friends, are they getting turned on by their shoes, etc to prepare themselves for human sex? If so than that would be a fetish.

There is nothing wrong with Fetishism. And I don't have anything against fetishism or sexual fetishism. But the problem I have is people who don't know the difference between sexual fetishism and Objectophilia. That is what I take offense to.

SEXUAL FETISHISM

Sexual fetishism, or erotic fetishism, is the sexual arousal a person receives from a physical object, or from a specific situation. The object or situation of interest is called the fetish; the person who has a fetish for that object/situation is a fetishist.[1] A sexual fetish may be regarded as an enhancing element to a romantic/sexual relationship "achieved in ordinary ways (e.g. having the partner wear a particular garment)" or as a mental disorder/disorder of sexual preference if it causes significant psychosocial distress for the person or has detrimental effects on important areas of their life.[2] Arousal from a particular body part is classified as partialism.[3]

This is also on Wikipedia that goes more into detail.

No they did not. They have no one to have sex with anyway.

My ex who was also aspie and incontinent claimed to have a diaper fetish and I asked him how can he call it a fetish if diapers don't turn him on. He said it was one because he likes it and it's seen as one so therefore he has a fetish. He told me fetish did not have to be sexual.


I did see an article recently about a man getting arrested for masturbating with a teddy bear and he has done it with other teddy bears as well. Someone on fetlife said he has a plushiephilia, whatever the word is. That person also called it a fetish.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/ ... ver-678234

BTW when I type in objectophilia and Objectum Sexuality Internationale, object sexuality pops up. Sorry this is all too confusing, especially when people call things fetishes because it's called philia at the end of the word or because people make out with it or because it's classified as one. I have also heard two words, fetish and sexual fetish. Even I have decided to say I have a lactation fetish and a spanking fetish and a diaper fetish, and so on because they are classified as one and everyone says they are all sexual. I guess if it involves other humans, maybe it's a true fetish? I find it easier to say it's not sexual for everyone and find it easier to ask if something is sexual for them. And I never said you called it a fetish. I did. I am not too sure myself if something is sexual for me or not because just because my husband says it is or says it turns me on doesn't mean he is correct. So many contradictions about the meaning of the word fetish so I have to stick with what I have been taught and not change my mind.

:shrugs:

But yet the dictionary says something else:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fetish

I don't know what to tell you. Believe whatever you want though I have given you comments showing you what is and what is not a fetish. Anyhow don't ever tell those who call themselves objectum sexual that they are fetishist or some of them will be on your arse like a diaper over it. There are a few of them that love objects like the Statue of Liberty, Titan the Robot and other statues. I guarantee Erika Eiffel knows the difference between a fetishist and an objectum sexual and she will tell you the same things that I have tried to tell you. So let's not argue over this and get back on topic.

NOT A FETISHIST BUT A PLUSHOPHILE. THAT IS AN INTIMATE AND IN MANY CASES A SEXUAL ATTRACTION TO STUFFED ANIMALS. HOW ARE YOU PEOPLE GETTING FETISH OUT OF OBJECTOPHILE AND PLUSHOPHILE IS BEYOND ME. THIS MAN IS A FOOL IF HE GOT ARRESTED FOR SOMETHING THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOING WITHIN THE PRIVACY OF HIS OWN HOME. YOU MAY AS WELL BE CALLING ME AND EVERYONE ELSE A FETISHIST TOO SINCE APPARENTLY YOU KNOW VERY LITTLE ABOUT THIS AND IS ONLY TAKING THE WORDS OF INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT REALLY RESEARCHING THIS.

REALLY? I'M SURPRISE YOU DIDN'T KNOW THIS.

Please lock this thread before I really get p***** off. I notice the arguing thing in your first blog too.

I am sorry but objectphilia is listed as a paraphilia on wikipedia.

I wonder how you found my blog anyway?

Locked on OP's request.