Page 2 of 8 [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

AJ89
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 339
Location: Canada

04 Jul 2012, 5:55 pm

My IQ is 107.


Hooray, I'm average!



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

04 Jul 2012, 6:01 pm

AJ89 wrote:
My IQ is 107.


Hooray, I'm average!


**fist bump**

Hooray for average, non-genius Aspies!!

:wink:


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

04 Jul 2012, 6:14 pm

What's my IQ? Irrelevant. :)


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


bizboy1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 945
Location: California, USA

04 Jul 2012, 6:30 pm

loner1984 wrote:
Hmm well that was an interesting test in that link.

118, must have been one of my better moments today, or i just got a lot of them right by accident. They do say to choose a random one if you arent sure instead of not answering.

Definitely the exception i would get that high. i seem to recall one many years ago where i got like 70 or something. 75.


Research shows that people with Asperger's do better on Raven's matrices.



Rascal77s
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

04 Jul 2012, 6:34 pm

Image



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

04 Jul 2012, 7:01 pm

bizboy1 wrote:
loner1984 wrote:
Hmm well that was an interesting test in that link.

118, must have been one of my better moments today, or i just got a lot of them right by accident. They do say to choose a random one if you arent sure instead of not answering.

Definitely the exception i would get that high. i seem to recall one many years ago where i got like 70 or something. 75.


Research shows that people with Asperger's do better on Raven's matrices.


Not quite.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Atomsk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,423

05 Jul 2012, 1:26 am

I think IQs are things best left to the imagination - meaning, I think people should keep their IQ scores between themselves and whoever gave them the test. People will only think you're trying to brag if your score is high - and if it's low I don't know what they'll think. Plus, in my experience, people don't often believe you when you say your IQ, and want proof and all that.

I also don't think that IQ scores really matter - how can a test possibly tell someone how intelligent they are? I've had multiple ones done, both as a child and as an adult. I don't think they matter at all - I may have great intelligence in some areas, but I -know- I am not very intelligent as others. Many things that others would consider "common sense", I fail to do/notice/whatever.

Also, internet tests give me all sorts of different results - I consider them very unreliable. Even my official, in person, paper/computer tests have fluctuated in score.



Sanctus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 981
Location: Hamburg, Germany

05 Jul 2012, 3:12 am

I agree that IQ isn't that important, and tests give various results. This thread is not for bragging, just comparing. ;)



CWA
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 669

05 Jul 2012, 10:06 am

When I was a kid I was considerred a genius. I don't know what happened lol. In collge I tested at around 138-142. My guess is that after having 2 kids my attention is shot and I would score in the low 130s, high 120s. However, I don't believe it means anything at all. I don't have the attention span to be a high acheiver and I'm terrible at math. Honestly, it's just a number based on how well I can solve tricky little puzzles and find patterns, which I am pretty good at...



Fluke83
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 147
Location: Norway

05 Jul 2012, 10:46 am

I got 115 on the Danish one that was posted here earlier.

I used to score much higher a few years back, but back then I hadn't yet become an alcoholic, heheh.

Good thing I stopped while I still have SOME of my wits about me..!



Ettina
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,971

05 Jul 2012, 10:55 am

107 on the test provided, which is Raven's Progressive Matrices. Be aware that this test measures spatial reasoning, and therefore will overestimate IQ if you have PIQ>VIQ and underestimate it if you have VIQ>PIQ. I have the latter pattern, on a more verbal-heavy test I get 137.



Fluke83
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 147
Location: Norway

05 Jul 2012, 11:06 am

Ettina wrote:
107 on the test provided, which is Raven's Progressive Matrices. Be aware that this test measures spatial reasoning, and therefore will overestimate IQ if you have PIQ>VIQ and underestimate it if you have VIQ>PIQ. I have the latter pattern, on a more verbal-heavy test I get 137.


Good point, I like the more varied tests actually, I found myself missing the old "Glove is to hand as hat is to ____________" :lol:

What's nice about the mixed tests also is that they usually give you a breakdown of the areas at the end, how you scored in each field, like spatial reasoning, verbal understanding, math etc.



Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,777
Location: USA

05 Jul 2012, 11:12 am

Rascal77s wrote:
Image


That's an extremely low IQ...

I took an online IQ test while brain dead and got 145. Actual IQ tests say I'm 130.


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html


Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

05 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm

Care to explain how to actually get that sum? The (-1)^k is totally throwing me off; the thing blips from positive to negative and you have to decide which one is increasing faster. And then there's the random factorials... Seriously, how the heck do you come up with the idea that the whole mess equals one over pi?


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,777
Location: USA

05 Jul 2012, 1:06 pm

Callista wrote:
Care to explain how to actually get that sum? The (-1)^k is totally throwing me off; the thing blips from positive to negative and you have to decide which one is increasing faster. And then there's the random factorials... Seriously, how the heck do you come up with the idea that the whole mess equals one over pi?


I didn't even bother to evaluate the power series. It was probably constructed from another series that equals 1/pi using identities.


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html


Washi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 804

05 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm

Rascal77s wrote:
Image

Ganondox wrote:
Callista wrote:
Care to explain how to actually get that sum? The (-1)^k is totally throwing me off; the thing blips from positive to negative and you have to decide which one is increasing faster. And then there's the random factorials... Seriously, how the heck do you come up with the idea that the whole mess equals one over pi?


I didn't even bother to evaluate the power series. It was probably constructed from another series that equals 1/pi using identities.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chudnovsky_algorithm