Verdandi wrote:
I wonder what kind of score someone who is not autistic would get. I'd be willing to accept it to some extent if I can see that people who haven't taken their training could reliably score 30-50% at least.
I got 12% and am NT. Some possible explanations:
1)I'm not as good at reading micro expressions as I think I am
2)the test deliberately downgrades scores in order to sell its' training videos
3)the test makes no attempt to downgrade scores but the actors are not accurately portraying the expressions because they are not actually trained actors (or sociopaths) and so aren't expert at conveying microexpressions for feelings they are not having.
Any one of those 3 is possible. I'd be most likely to accept that I am not good at reading micro expressions if I see other NTs get a far better score (such as your suggested 30-50%). If other NTs get scores as low or nearly as low as mine, the it would be either that the downgrading is intentional or the actors can't quite convey the micro expressions without truly feeling the feelings because they aren't trained actors. I think this is likely since as every poker player knows, micro expressions are hard to fake. Poker players are the other group that self-trains in faking them and even then I'm told it takes years. I sure can't fake them. I took an acting class and was appalled when I saw the test videos of myself (and the other class members) at how terribly I and they did at faking micro expressions. Mot class members got the macro expressions right but the micro expressions were much harder.