Callista wrote:
100% on both, no problems. I might not have passed when I was younger, but nowadays I can navigate the grammar and keep each person's list of facts known in short-term memory long enough to compare them. It's still tricky, but totally doable. It's like a logic puzzle.
I begin to think that theory of mind problems among autistics may not, in fact, be theory of mind problems at all, but complex-language and multi-tasking problems. To solve problems like the one on the quiz, you have to be able to interpret relatively complex grammar, as well as mentally keep track of several sets of facts and edit those sets of facts as you get new information. This is not something an autistic "one-track" mind is particularly good at. Interpreting human actions, intentions, and knowledge are just where the language and mult-tasking becomes most complex, where the most possible dimensions are simultaneously in play; so it's where you can see the drawbacks of the autistic cognitive style the most easily.
This is interesting. In my mid to late teens I did a lot of those logic puzzles where you have to read through a list of clues and then deduct the solution by checking off cross.matches between different possibilities.
I feel this has helped me a great deal in learning the mechanics behind interpreting written stories like this one. I often find I am now far better at interpreting written material than many others eg at work.