What is your aspie-score?

Post Reply New Topic

Your Aspie score: 127 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 46 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie

not that high compared to others

126/200

Thank you for filling out this questionnaire.

Your Aspie score: 119 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 81 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie

Fu<krys!! ! I am a purebred aspie; nothing NT about me other then the fact that currently I see it necessary to be like one.

Rarsclart!! !

Your Aspie score: 73 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 89 of 200
You are both Aspie and neurotypicalComments

Sources of inspiration for this questionnaire have been:
Martha Kate Downey’s List of Characteristics
from her CD-book Tap Dancing in the Night
Roger Meyers & Moggy
The AQ test
Tony Attwood
The geek quiz
The original Aspie-quiz
Australian AS scale
Dr Amen's ADD test
Inger Lorelei
Mattias Axner
Other Aspies and own observations.

O-dear maybe it's coz I stuck more ?

Do you have an alternative view of what is attractive in the opposite sex compared to most others? What exactly do most other's view on attractive.... I am sure alot have dif thing's they view as attractive...

Do you have an urge to jump over objects? Last time i looked this was a sport....

Can't be bothered to list the rest

/* // I like this remark from rdos
How do you know? In version 7, 80% of those professionally diagnosed with AS get "you are very likely Aspie". 14% get "you are both Aspie and neurotypical" and 6% get "you are very likely neurotypical". Do you think the assessments of professionals are any better? I don't.
*/

// The question's are different machine have a look.........

Dec 06, 2006---- whats the 12-5-06 wasnt even reg then......

Machine ill think ill take the word of 3 experts than a guy with no qualifications in the field trying to prove his theory that no scientist has checked over...

And by the way professional diagnose do not just go on questions...

Last edited by logitechdog on 23 Dec 2006, 8:08 pm, edited 6 times in total.

Your Aspie score: 175 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 12 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie

12-05-06 post
http://www.wrongplanet.net/modules.php? ... &start=660



I took the test in June got 182 and took it a day or 2 ago and got 180.

I know there where alot of difference in version 7 and 8. My point was my score did not change much. Yours should have not changed much either. My opinion is you are trying to invalidate the test by providing false results. Your motivation is your diagreement with RDOS. You disagreement with RDOS is routed in your natural tendency to think you have all the answers.

Also editing your past post after I have commented on them is causing real continuity
problems. It would be nice if you used new posts instead of editing.

No machine they are different right now check it.... not from 7 to 8...

Don't need to prove him wrong, ill wait till they find the gentics....

And I don't think I have all the answers - Rdos doesn't even have any Qualifications in the field… so does that make him wrong 2001 he invented his theory - 2006 - coming up to 2007 he still has not give it out, why? maybe coz they will rip it apart...

Version 8
Thank you for filling out this questionnaire.

Your Aspie score: 187 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 7 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie

Just re took it to make you happy It seemed like the same test I only notice like one
or two question I did not remember from a few days ago (hence why my score seemed to change). The theory he has on the origins of autism has little to do with the
test.

I took the second stim test though it was not used to caluculate a score. I did find it
very hard to think why I did certain stim.

Your Aspie score: 138 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 66 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie

Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 33 of 200
You are very likely the Aspie the prophecy spoke of.

Wrong logitechdog, in the article about Aspie-quiz, I also mentioned the Neanderthal theory, and three different journals decided they couldn't "rip it apart" and therefore didn't send it on peer-review.

Those that have studied the Neanderthal theory after mid-November would probably have noticed it's been updated with Aspie-quiz and have also been rewritten to a more "professional-looking" style. This was done because of the inclusion of the Neanderthal theory in those articles.

Have you actaly done any field work in your theory of the neanderthal... Or you just taking it out of books And what qualification's you got in the field to even piece this together - I stoped reading disorder's coz they is too many of them saying the exact same thing about As.... Also like the way you throw everyone else out and - only care about what you think and what you want to know...

/*
Peer review (known as refereeing in some academic fields) is a process of subjecting an author's scholarly work or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the field.

The peer review process is aimed at getting authors to meet the standards of their discipline and of science generally. Publications and awards that have not undergone peer review are likely to be regarded with suspicion by scholars and professionals in many fields. Even refereed journals, however, have been shown to contain error, fraud and other flaws that undermine their formality.
*/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3346455.stm looks like your research is stolen... should not say that really coz everything is blah rdos

The idea that Neanderthals may have interbred with humans is likely older than RDOS
himself. I think RDOS theory is autisic trait may have entered the modern human gene
pool from Neanderthal genes.

It is just a theory and genetic research will answer the question in the future.

I obviously have. While the main intention of Aspie-quiz was (and still is) to provide a service for undiagnosed autistics, I've also used it to research the validity of the Neanderthal theory. That's why I had both Aspie-quiz and the Neanderthal theory in my paper. The scientific aspect of Aspie-quiz becomes more interesting when validating it in the framework of an autism-theory.

Besides, I started-up Aspie-quiz partly because it was impossible to prove or refute the Neanderthal theory due to lack of research.



In addition to a Master of Science degree, I've acquired the rest of the needed "qualifications" by self-study. I have no interest in a formal degree in psychology, especially not since I think the formal education is pretty useless for autism-study.



I'm trying to get it published because of the ways (mostly NTs) deal with research.



Not at all. The article doesn't say anything about Neanderthals and autism. It is a postulate of the Neanderthal theory that Neanderthals must have contributed genes to modern humans. As such, I've shown interest in general human evolution. Since 2001, I think the view of a single, African, ancestor of humans have again changed. Few people in the field think that Neanderthals were wiped out, even though this view is still popular in the news and popular presentations. The genetic evidences clearly speak against such a thing.