Page 2 of 5 [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

little_black_sheep
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 132
Location: Up in Space

28 Dec 2012, 9:51 pm

Test taken on 28 December 2012: You scored 14.0 out of 22 in 8.8 seconds

I am confused that NT males score lower than Aspies :?


_________________
Every morning in Africa, an antelope wakes up. It knows it must outrun the fastest lion, or it will be killed. Every morning in Africa, a lion wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the slowest antelope, or it will starve. It doesn't matter if you're


MaKin
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 246

28 Dec 2012, 10:21 pm

Test taken on 28 December 2012: You scored 4.0 out of 22 in 13.9 seconds

this seems a negative result. i'll take it again and see if i do better. at one point i just had to guess because none of the options seemed correct, or i simply had no clue.


Edit: i took it a second time and did just a bit better

Test taken on 28 December 2012: You scored 6.0 out of 22 in 8.5 seconds

it would be nice to know correct answers.



icyfire4w5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 621

29 Dec 2012, 1:04 am

Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 14.0 out of 22 in 3.4 seconds

The average score for males with ASD is 12.0 out of 22 in 9.1 seconds
The average score for females with ASD is 11.4 out of 22 in 7.4 seconds
The average score for males with suspected ASD is 12.4 out of 22 in 11.1 seconds
The average score for females with suspected ASD is 12.2 out of 22 in 11.0 seconds
The average score for male neurotypicals is 9.7 out of 22 in 15.3 seconds
The average score for female neurotypicals is 14.7 out of 22 in 9.0 seconds

(Argh! I re-did this test because my browser suddenly crashed while I was doing it for the first time.)



Stalk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,138

29 Dec 2012, 7:39 am

I wonder if the score should be interpreted on how many you get wrong. :scratch:



Noetic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,277
Location: UK

29 Dec 2012, 8:45 am

little_black_sheep wrote:
Test taken on 28 December 2012: You scored 14.0 out of 22 in 8.8 seconds

I am confused that NT males score lower than Aspies :?

As I speculated before, people on the spectrum spend much of their lives consciously trying to analyse situations and verbalise/figure out what is going on. I believe that we have more practice at looking at situations and intellectually analysing them, sometimes perhaps overcompensating for our own shortcomings (which unlike NTs we are aware of) - this may explain why people on the spectrum seem to be doing relatively well on average.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

29 Dec 2012, 8:47 am

I looked up the research paper associated with this test and the correlation was higher scores = more accuracy. However, 19 of the 22 AS/HFA participants scored above 9, indicating that a score in the midrange is not strictly indicative.



YellowBanana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,032
Location: mostly, in my head.

29 Dec 2012, 9:12 am

Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 10.0 out of 22 in 9.5 seconds

I'm a bit disappointed ... I was SURE I'd scored better than that!


_________________
Female. Dx ASD in 2011 @ Age 38. Also Dx BPD


r84shi37
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 448

29 Dec 2012, 2:51 pm

Noetic wrote:
little_black_sheep wrote:
Test taken on 28 December 2012: You scored 14.0 out of 22 in 8.8 seconds

I am confused that NT males score lower than Aspies :?

As I speculated before, people on the spectrum spend much of their lives consciously trying to analyse situations and verbalise/figure out what is going on. I believe that we have more practice at looking at situations and intellectually analysing them, sometimes perhaps overcompensating for our own shortcomings (which unlike NTs we are aware of) - this may explain why people on the spectrum seem to be doing relatively well on average.


This makes sense. I felt like I was just using deductive reasoning to find my answers. Well, also, I feel like I used my slightly above average audio memory along with a few other things to help me get the answers. I took it at 2 in the morning though, so I barely remember "how" I took it as far as methods and stuff. :P


_________________
Do I have HFA? Nope, I've never seen a psychiatrist in my life. I'm just here to talk to you crazies. ; - )


littlelily613
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,608
Location: Canada

29 Dec 2012, 3:05 pm

Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 7.0 out of 22 in 4.2 seconds


_________________
Diagnosed with classic Autism
AQ score= 48
PDD assessment score= 170 (severe PDD)
EQ=8 SQ=93 (Extreme Systemizer)
Alexithymia Quiz=164/185 (high)


Filipendula
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jun 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 270
Location: UK

29 Dec 2012, 3:52 pm

Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 17.0 out of 22 in 7.8 seconds


The average score for males with ASD is 12.1 out of 22 in 8.9 seconds
The average score for females with ASD is 11.5 out of 22 in 7.4 seconds
The average score for males with suspected ASD is 12.5 out of 22 in 11.0 seconds
The average score for females with suspected ASD is 12.2 out of 22 in 11.0 seconds
The average score for male neurotypicals is 9.7 out of 22 in 15.3 seconds
The average score for female neurotypicals is 14.7 out of 22 in 9.0 seconds


_________________
AQ: 32 (up to 37 when answering instinctively); EQ: 21 - 24; SQ: 31
Reading the Mind in the Eyes: 32
RAADS-R: 85
RDOS Aspie score: 115/200; NT score: 79/200


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

29 Dec 2012, 4:12 pm

Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 16.0 out of 22 in 7.7 seconds

the problem with this test is that is was designed by Baron-Cohen. a great deal of the things he takes for granted about empathy and emotional intelligence, especially regarding gender differences, is not necessarily reliable or valid in the real world.

interestingly... for empathy tests, if men do not know they are being tested, they will score the same as women. society tells men they don't understand emotions and can't "read" what people are feeling, so they believe it. but if you trick them by testing them on the sly, they are no worse than women at reading emotions.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Last edited by hyperlexian on 29 Dec 2012, 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

wtfid2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,712
Location: usa

29 Dec 2012, 4:32 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 16.0 out of 22 in 7.7 seconds

the problem with this test is that is was designed by Baron-Cohen. a great deal of the things he takes for granted about empathy and emotional intelligence, especially regarding gender differences, is not necessarily reliable or valid in the real world.

interestingly... for empathy tests, if men do not know they are being tested, they will score the same as women. society tells men they don't understand emotions and can't "read" what people are feeling, so they believe it. but if you trick them by testing them on the sly, they are no worse than women at reading emotions.
that's interesting..although since they have that stigma they will be worse at it in real world situations


_________________
AQ 25

Your Aspie score: 101 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 111 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits


idratherbeatree
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 302

29 Dec 2012, 4:43 pm

Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 8.0 out of 22 in 9.0 seconds


_________________
Severe Tourette's With OCD Features.
Reconsidering ASD, I might just be NVLD.


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

29 Dec 2012, 6:01 pm

wtfid2 wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 16.0 out of 22 in 7.7 seconds

the problem with this test is that is was designed by Baron-Cohen. a great deal of the things he takes for granted about empathy and emotional intelligence, especially regarding gender differences, is not necessarily reliable or valid in the real world.

interestingly... for empathy tests, if men do not know they are being tested, they will score the same as women. society tells men they don't understand emotions and can't "read" what people are feeling, so they believe it. but if you trick them by testing them on the sly, they are no worse than women at reading emotions.
that's interesting..although since they have that stigma they will be worse at it in real world situations

that is totally true, yes. the only way they could get an accurate result was to trick the test subjects (they set up a situation with a loved one where they had to guess what they were thinking or feeling, if i recall correctly, but they were never told what they were being tested for)


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

29 Dec 2012, 6:23 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
wtfid2 wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 16.0 out of 22 in 7.7 seconds

the problem with this test is that is was designed by Baron-Cohen. a great deal of the things he takes for granted about empathy and emotional intelligence, especially regarding gender differences, is not necessarily reliable or valid in the real world.

interestingly... for empathy tests, if men do not know they are being tested, they will score the same as women. society tells men they don't understand emotions and can't "read" what people are feeling, so they believe it. but if you trick them by testing them on the sly, they are no worse than women at reading emotions.
that's interesting..although since they have that stigma they will be worse at it in real world situations

that is totally true, yes. the only way they could get an accurate result was to trick the test subjects (they set up a situation with a loved one where they had to guess what they were thinking or feeling, if i recall correctly, but they were never told what they were being tested for)



So you would basically have to manipulate them for the accurate score.

Not all manipulation is bad.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

29 Dec 2012, 7:15 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
wtfid2 wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Test taken on 29 December 2012: You scored 16.0 out of 22 in 7.7 seconds

the problem with this test is that is was designed by Baron-Cohen. a great deal of the things he takes for granted about empathy and emotional intelligence, especially regarding gender differences, is not necessarily reliable or valid in the real world.

interestingly... for empathy tests, if men do not know they are being tested, they will score the same as women. society tells men they don't understand emotions and can't "read" what people are feeling, so they believe it. but if you trick them by testing them on the sly, they are no worse than women at reading emotions.
that's interesting..although since they have that stigma they will be worse at it in real world situations

that is totally true, yes. the only way they could get an accurate result was to trick the test subjects (they set up a situation with a loved one where they had to guess what they were thinking or feeling, if i recall correctly, but they were never told what they were being tested for)


This sounds a lot like stereotype threat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype_threat