Quote:
I'm pretty sure that significant social impairment is a mandatory criterion for DSM-IV. Psychologists admit that social skills can be learned. Therefore, if I learn them, I will no longer pass that criterion, thus technically 'curing' myself of AS. Isn't that obvious?
Everyone is constantly learning new social skills. An AS person can learn new social skills, but more slowly than an NT will, and therefore you'll remain behind.
In addition, if you use a conscious process for things most people do unconsciously, fatigue will affect you more. Conscious mental processes take more energy than unconscious ones.
Quote:
I'm only saying that an employer wouldn't react in my favour when they read about me having AS, regardless of whether I have good social skills or not.
It depends on the employer, and probably on the job as well. I've heard of some computer-related jobs where employers will preferentially hire AS people on the perception that they're better with computers. In addition, when volunteering with disabled kids, most of my volunteer coordinators seem to expect my autism to make me better at handling autistic kids (and they're right about that).
If you're concerned, try explaining how your AS could be an advantage, or at very least not a disadvantage, in your chosen career. For example, having to consciously analyze social cues that others get intuitively could be a big help for a research psychologist (my own ambition).
One thing that's a bigger impediment than a diagnosis, for hiring, is a criminal record, and I've heard of guys who use their criminal records to their advantage. One guy who used to smuggle drugs got hired for a business position based on what he'd learnt about business management from being a drug smuggler (which is, after all, a business). If the right framing can get that sounding like a good thing, it'll be easier to do that with a diagnosis.