paris75007 wrote:
You can take it with a grain of salt if you want to, but your experience backs me up...most will not qualify. That's just statistics. I didn't say that's fair, but that's the way it is. I struggle with working as much as the next Aspie, and feel I have very little in the way of a social safety net and wish that wasn't the case. Your opinion is based on your experience and mine is based on knowledge of how the system works, and having processed hundreds of cases myself. Examiners (at initial and recon level) have very little leeway in the way they make their decisions, Either they can argue you meet the criteria I posted, or they cannot, based on the info provided. If they don't have an airtight case they have to deny you or the review board will return it. They don't get any kudos for denying cases or have any quota to meet of allowances/denials. Judges, on the other hand, have tons of leeway, and it sounds like you got a bad judge.
I edited my post because I felt that my first writing was too confrontational and directed at you and I didn't want to direct anything at you. I am sorry about that. My frustration is with the process.
From what I have seen, it seems that SSA has an organizational bias against approving even those who are qualified, which is why most people end up getting approval at the hearing level.
It also seems to me that the paperwork itself is designed in such a manner that it is completely unclear as to what SSA is looking for - the function report, for example, is quite misleading.
"Bad judge" is exactly what my attorney said. For example, one justification he used was that I had never experienced any periods of decompensation since 1996, so that opinion overrode multiple other better-informed professionals. The fact was that working was extremely difficult for me at the time as well, I just hadn't admitted it and kept trying. The other fact was that I had experienced multiple periods of decompensation since 1996, and he ignored all references to those. He also ignored every listed severe impairment and refuted each of the impairments identified as moderate or mild as if they existed in a vacuum.
Lilithlee wrote:
What y'all our saying is I should see what in my area frist before I try for SSI?
Yes.