Page 2 of 3 [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

PrncssAlay
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 321
Location: Midwest, Southwest, Northwest, California

30 Apr 2013, 3:09 pm

Fnord wrote:
Because of Aspies like me, whose children have grown up to be responsible and productive members of society; with college degrees, five-figure incomes, and upwardly-mobile careers.

Wouldn't it be hilarious if Aspie traits turn out to have an evolutionary ADVANTAGE? With so many historical examples of outstanding Aspie and autistic achievers, OP must be just guessing (or projecting) when he comes up with his assumptions.

I for one have always been very pleased to be alive, and in my small way have justified taking up space on our planet.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

30 Apr 2013, 3:16 pm

PrncssAlay wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Because of Aspies like me, whose children have grown up to be responsible and productive members of society; with college degrees, five-figure incomes, and upwardly-mobile careers.

Wouldn't it be hilarious if Aspie traits turn out to have an evolutionary ADVANTAGE? With so many historical examples of outstanding Aspie and autistic achievers, OP must be just guessing (or projecting) when he comes up with his assumptions.


Fnord's example is more the exception than the rule. Although I would say that there are more ways to be productive than how Fnord describes his children. I don't have any of those things, but I have done worthwhile things and contributed in my own way.

RPG83 wrote:
Whoa, looks like I'm an exception: I don't believe I will ever have children (even though I'm still a teenager). But who really knows?


I am 43 and I do not have children. I went through a period of wanting children, but as with driving I decided that parenting would be more responsibility than I wanted or possibly could cope with. But that's a decision people have to come to on their own.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,833
Location: London

30 Apr 2013, 3:50 pm

PrncssAlay wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Because of Aspies like me, whose children have grown up to be responsible and productive members of society; with college degrees, five-figure incomes, and upwardly-mobile careers.

Wouldn't it be hilarious if Aspie traits turn out to have an evolutionary ADVANTAGE? With so many historical examples of outstanding Aspie and autistic achievers, OP must be just guessing (or projecting) when he comes up with his assumptions.

There aren't very many examples of "outstanding Aspie achievers", people just assign the Aspie label to people they idolise, even those who clearly aren't autistic.

It is not guesswork to see that the vast majority of autistic people are disabled by their Aspie traits. Even the 1/6 Aspies who are able to hold down a job tend to have social issues that make them less likely to reproduce, and if they do reproduce, likely to do so with a less successful mate, which has further implications for their offspring's reproductive success.

Personally, I have a preference to not have children, because I imagine I'd be a terrible parent, and if I do have a child, I would prefer to just have one, because I would have strongly preferred to have been an only child.



Jensen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2013
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,018
Location: Denmark

30 Apr 2013, 4:04 pm

Walrus! The strongest wish of an only child is to have siblings, - someone to identify with and to rebell against parents with, - and someone to share parent-focus with! They can only focus on one at a time :lol:


_________________
Femaline
Special Interest: Beethoven


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,833
Location: London

30 Apr 2013, 4:08 pm

I don't identify with my younger brother, and we don't rebel together- if anything, we see our parents as allies in our struggle against the other brother. My older brother is much older (26), and I guess I don't mind him too much but he is out of the way- when we were growing up, he lived with his father in Sussex, and he now has his own flat and spends a lot of his time working abroad.



Jensen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2013
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,018
Location: Denmark

30 Apr 2013, 4:16 pm

The same here. My brother (12 years older) lived with his father. I grew up as an only child, thinking of him as some kind of uncle. We never got really like siblings. He too had a life with much traveling. Only after our mother died, we got closer. He was ill, and I wanted to show him my affection (he had been my idol), so I assisted him any way I could, until he died from a kidney disease 3 years ago. We got a bit closer, but we never got past his anger over me "having" our mother.


_________________
Femaline
Special Interest: Beethoven


Stoek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2012
Age: 94
Gender: Male
Posts: 762

30 Apr 2013, 4:38 pm

Fnord wrote:
WestBender84 wrote:
Why are so many WP users intent on having children when their children will probably grow up to be as poor, misunderstood, and generally discriminated against as their eventual parents (you, the people with ASD who want to have one or more children) are?

Because of Aspies like me, whose children have grown up to be responsible and productive members of society; with college degrees, five-figure incomes, and upwardly-mobile careers.
I'm more inclined to agree with you. Most of the aspies I've witness seem to be far more limited by an accurate model for behavior than any genetic impairment.

I'm having kids, it's not even a question at this point, the question is simply will I intentionally marry a female aspie or an nt one.



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

30 Apr 2013, 4:40 pm

why is the assumption that being neurotypical always makes you a better parent?

If anything i find being ASD has had certain advantages. My girls are fascinated by my special skills and love watching me paint my pictures.


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

30 Apr 2013, 4:50 pm

Stoek wrote:
I'm more inclined to agree with you. Most of the aspies I've witness seem to be far more limited by an accurate model for behavior than any genetic impairment.


And the basis for such a broadly sweeping statement is what, exactly? Fnord's a statistical outlier, and exceptions don't prove rules.



megocode3
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2013
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 92

30 Apr 2013, 4:57 pm

WestBender84 wrote:
Why are so many WP users intent on having children when their children will probably grow up to be as poor, misunderstood, and generally discriminated against as their eventual parents (you, the people with ASD who want to have one or more children) are?

I don't expect more than a few responses to this question, seeing how asocial people have little use for a social forum. I just had to ask!


I think the problem with your question is your assumption that everyone with an ASD is poor, misunderstood and discriminated against. I actually view my AS as a gift more than anything. What I lack in social skills I make up for with an amazing gift in engineering. This gift earns me a nice 6-figure income and my unique perspective on solving engineering problems earns me respect from my peers. Don't get me wrong, things are definitely not easy for me and I struggle to keep jobs but I do OK.

I was lucky enough to meet someone who actually liked me because I was "different". We now have 3 kids together. Our son was recently diagnosed with classic autism. I know he'll have his struggles but I know that he'll also be capable of great things. Having children was the best decision I ever made.



Stoek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2012
Age: 94
Gender: Male
Posts: 762

30 Apr 2013, 5:30 pm

Verdandi wrote:
Stoek wrote:
I'm more inclined to agree with you. Most of the aspies I've witness seem to be far more limited by an accurate model for behavior than any genetic impairment.


And the basis for such a broadly sweeping statement is what, exactly? Fnord's a statistical outlier, and exceptions don't prove rules.
He's at best simply on one end of the bell curve not an outlier.

My guess is that he's quite typical of the undiagnosed category, and I'm not getting in some debate on stats for people that can't get diagnosed.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

30 Apr 2013, 5:56 pm

Stoek wrote:
He's at best simply on one end of the bell curve not an outlier.

My guess is that he's quite typical of the undiagnosed category, and I'm not getting in some debate on stats for people that can't get diagnosed.


If he's at one end of the bell curve, it's likely an extreme end. There are a few others on here who are in a similar category, and some who no longer post, but they are not the majority.

You probably shouldn't get into a debate on stats, because existing statistics paint a fairly easy to find picture that does not match up with your expression of wishful thinking. I am probably more typical of the undiagnosed category than Fnord is. And that category would include people for whom diagnosis is economically inaccessible, due to not having jobs or insurance, unless they seek benefits.

The notion of an undiagnosed population of autistic people who are all successful university graduates with five-six figure jobs is largely a product of imagination. Most people with autistic traits who would have these features are more likely to be BAP, but not ever diagnosable as autistic. This would be evidenced by the fact that they are not experiencing significant impairment in daily life. Some who are in that category (degrees, high-paying jobs) who are diagnosable do experience impairment. I know Fnord does, as he's described it. Another I recall was experiencing poor performance reviews because of her inability to network or interact socially with other employees - but that ended when she received her diagnosis, and her employers stopped counting her social skills against her.

Anyway, you can argue that there are an infinite number of affluent autistics dancing on the head of a pin all you want, but that won't make it true.



Stoek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2012
Age: 94
Gender: Male
Posts: 762

30 Apr 2013, 6:04 pm

Verdandi wrote:
Stoek wrote:
He's at best simply on one end of the bell curve not an outlier.

My guess is that he's quite typical of the undiagnosed category, and I'm not getting in some debate on stats for people that can't get diagnosed.


If he's at one end of the bell curve, it's likely an extreme end. There are a few others on here who are in a similar category, and some who no longer post, but they are not the majority.

You probably shouldn't get into a debate on stats, because existing statistics paint a fairly easy to find picture that does not match up with your expression of wishful thinking. I am probably more typical of the undiagnosed category than Fnord is. And that category would include people for whom diagnosis is economically inaccessible, due to not having jobs or insurance, unless they seek benefits.

The notion of an undiagnosed population of autistic people who are all successful university graduates with five-six figure jobs is largely a product of imagination. Most people with autistic traits who would have these features are more likely to be BAP, but not ever diagnosable as autistic. This would be evidenced by the fact that they are not experiencing significant impairment in daily life. Some who are in that category (degrees, high-paying jobs) who are diagnosable do experience impairment. I know Fnord does, as he's described it. Another I recall was experiencing poor performance reviews because of her inability to network or interact socially with other employees - but that ended when she received her diagnosis, and her employers stopped counting her social skills against her.

Anyway, you can argue that there are an infinite number of affluent autistics dancing on the head of a pin all you want, but that won't make it true.


Since it's adressed to me, I'll be fair enough to admit I never read this, wish you well though.



briankelley
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 666
Location: STENDEC

30 Apr 2013, 6:31 pm

A. I don't find myself in the position of wishing I had never been born.

B. Life is tough on everyone and having kids is always a crap shoot regarding how they will turn out.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

30 Apr 2013, 6:47 pm

Stoek wrote:
Since it's adressed to me, I'll be fair enough to admit I never read this, wish you well though.


Wasn't really for your benefit.



Stoek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2012
Age: 94
Gender: Male
Posts: 762

30 Apr 2013, 7:05 pm

briankelley wrote:
A. I don't find myself in the position of wishing I had never been born.
This is the part I identify with.

B. Life is tough on everyone and having kids is always a crap shoot regarding how they will turn out.
.