well, the doctors really didn't say no...
andrewlavigne
Snowy Owl
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40a52/40a5250dc4163a35cb216f017ca32e665aed619f" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 9 Oct 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 125
Location: Fredericton, NB/Halifax, NS
Fnord wrote:
andrewlavigne wrote:
Why doesn't it occur to these therapists that a person on the spectrum might very well want a label for the sake of having a label?
"For the sake of having a label"? Is THAT why people self-diagnose? So that they can have a label?
There are not enough varieties of facepalm images to cover that one.
While I appreciate you trying to rope me into your weird crusade against the self-diagnosed, that is not nearly what I meant. I meant that having a label for oneself makes one's difficulties intelligible and thus manageable. Being able to put a name on something makes that thing simpler to understand and deal with. Autistics like order and putting a name on one's difficulties allows for such order. I meant nothing about people self-diagnosis as a matter of arbitrary personal identity.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
WHAT IF... The Moon Didn't Exist? |
21 Dec 2024, 6:46 am |
If only peer pressure didn't exist |
09 Jan 2025, 8:37 pm |