So, apaprently I can't be diagnosed with Asperger's anymore

Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

PintoNess
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Posts: 35

23 Feb 2014, 1:19 am

KateGladstone wrote:
Re:

> I spell it apaprently due to a thing

I don't understand that.


> and also it feels better.)

I don't understand that, either.


My apologies. I was having difficulty wording things (still kind of am, but it's clearing up), and what I meant was that I spell it "apaprently" vs "apparently" because when I spell it the latter way it gives me anxiety. Normally, that problem is only verbal, knowingly pronouncing things incorrectly because they feel better in my mouth when I say them. Certain phonemes are more comfortable to say, and some are actually physically painful because of how they feel. I don't know how to explain it more clearly than that, sorry. With apaprently, though, I can pronounce it the actual correct way aloud, but when I'm typing it I have to spell it apaprently. It could possibly be a psychosomatic thing, but it's still anxiety inducing and I don't want to go through the process of desensitizing myself to something again, at least not for something so trivial.



PintoNess
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Posts: 35

23 Feb 2014, 1:19 am

KateGladstone wrote:
Re:

> I spell it apaprently due to a thing

I don't understand that.


> and also it feels better.)

I don't understand that, either.


My apologies. I was having difficulty wording things (still kind of am, but it's clearing up), and what I meant was that I spell it "apaprently" vs "apparently" because when I spell it the latter way it gives me anxiety. Normally, that problem is only verbal, knowingly pronouncing things incorrectly because they feel better in my mouth when I say them. Certain phonemes are more comfortable to say, and some are actually physically painful because of how they feel. I don't know how to explain it more clearly than that, sorry. With apaprently, though, I can pronounce it the actual correct way aloud, but when I'm typing it I have to spell it apaprently. It could possibly be a psychosomatic thing, but it's still anxiety inducing and I don't want to go through the process of desensitizing myself to something again, at least not for something so trivial.



Sedentarian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Aug 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,682
Location: Madison, WI

23 Feb 2014, 2:33 pm

I think you are trying to act normal too much. We are not normal. So why should you act like you are.


_________________
Mildly autistic WrongPlanet Member, teenage boy, and screen time lover extraordinaire. PM me if you want!


PintoNess
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Posts: 35

23 Feb 2014, 9:15 pm

Because, for one, I've never genuinely allowed myself to be entirely "me", so I don't really know who that is anymore, and for two, I'm mostly comfortable with it. It's not like I'm faking an entirely other person, just editing myself a bit. I'm more 'socially acceptable' this way, and thus have more friends, and hurt fewer people. For three, I've been working so hard at it for the past few years that it's become fairly easy, most of the time, though there are a few skills that I've not been able to pick up no matter how hard I've tried. Also, I'm not trying to act normal, per se, I'm still "weird", and eccentric, but I'm more aware of what might hurt someone's feelings and how to phrase things in a better way. I suppose one way to explain it would be I'm minimizing the negative behavior traits of my Asperger's and keeping the neutral and more positive ones.



PintoNess
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Posts: 35

23 Feb 2014, 9:17 pm

Because, for one, I've never genuinely allowed myself to be entirely "me", so I don't really know who that is anymore, and for two, I'm mostly comfortable with it. It's not like I'm faking an entirely other person, just editing myself a bit. I'm more 'socially acceptable' this way, and thus have more friends, and hurt fewer people. For three, I've been working so hard at it for the past few years that it's become fairly easy, most of the time, though there are a few skills that I've not been able to pick up no matter how hard I've tried. Also, I'm not trying to act normal, per se, I'm still "weird", and eccentric, but I'm more aware of what might hurt someone's feelings and how to phrase things in a better way. I suppose one way to explain it would be I'm minimizing the negative behavior traits of my Asperger's and keeping the neutral and more positive ones.



structrix
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 535

24 Feb 2014, 11:26 am

I'm having the same problem getting a diagnosis as well. I am still trying to work on it though. Do not give up!


_________________
AQ= 41
Your Aspie score: 144 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 66 of 200
I am an Aspie!
Diagnosed as an adult


Clandestiny
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 29

24 Feb 2014, 11:01 pm

Sare wrote:
I can understand your reasons for wanting a diagnosis. I just want to let you know that your experience regarding diagnosis is not unique, as many women on the spectrum face the same challenge. It is because the current diagnostic criteria is based on the male profile. It is much harder for women to receive a diagnosis because of all the coping and masking strategies. Women are more likely to be misdiagnosed, overlooked or labelled 'residual' Asperger's. You'll likely be told that you have 'Asperger's' but you're not dysfunctional enough to merit a diagnostic report. It is very frustrating. There are professionals out there who are working toward getting a female diagnostic profile recognised.


That is utterly fascinating and makes a TON of sense. Am I correct in assuming this is due to how women are trained and raised in society? Meaning they are raised and trained to be more emotional/open about emotions and learn a lot of social scripts anyway for lots of different situations, while it's socially acceptable/expected for men to be more withdrawn, less open, and more "rugged" denoting less training and scripts to deal with similar situations?



Waterfalls
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,075

25 Feb 2014, 2:16 am

Some people think it's more genetic, but yes. There's an enormous amount of social guiding and providing scripts that goes on. And more socially acceptable for women to be dependent, asking for and accepting scripts.

There's a cost, though, to the high value placed on being social when you're female. To fail socially as a female elicits guidance, but also an extreme disapproval.



886
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,664
Location: SLC, Utah

25 Feb 2014, 6:17 am

I think the common mistake people think about when it comes to autism spectrum disorders is that you have to have crap social skills. It's not as if they can't be learned. I didn't really learn most of what I know today socially until age 20. In middle school, I was god awful.


_________________
If Jesus died for my sins, then I should sin as much as possible, so he didn't die for nothing.