Page 2 of 2 [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

heavenlyabyss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,393

12 Apr 2014, 11:00 pm

When I took the test, I scored highly in working memory(in the top 2% I think). However, I was much much lower on some of the other sections. The part with picture sequencing annoyed the hell out me. Don't think I did well on that. Point is I scored higher on working memory than any other section.

Perhaps this means I'm not autistic (only an informal diagnosis that I question). Also, keep in mind, not everyone here has autism, as a side note.

I have read that schizophrenia is correlated with a low working memory as well.



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

12 Apr 2014, 11:13 pm

I seem to get hyper-focused, "attached" to something such that the rest of the world, and existence itself fades into the background of my mind. It is in this state where I may become "absent minded". However, I don't feel "absent mindedness" indicates any impairment in working memory; it is just my preference to hyper-focus.

Quoted: "However, some evidence suggests that there may be minimal impairment in high-functioning autistic (HFA) individuals in that they have intact associative learning ability, verbal working memory, and recognition memory". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_and_working_memory

Listed possible physiological explanations for impaired working memory:

- poor ability to focus on relevant information and thus a deficit within the central executive aspect of working memory
- limited ability to focus and conceptualize categories using updated information
- individuals within the spectrum have also been proposed to have a weak central coherence (i.e., as a limited ability to understand context or to "see the big picture")
- a reduced tendency for processing information in context and integration of higher-level meaning.
- local bias for visual information processing, that is, a preference for processing local features (details, parts) rather than global features (the whole)

It seems like doctors are indicating that preferential focusing indicates working memory impairment ??



Rocket123
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2012
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,188
Location: Lost in Space

12 Apr 2014, 11:54 pm

Rascal77s wrote:
I also took the WMS and all of the subtests on it with the exception of the two associative memory subtests were below 10%. My associative memory subtests were above the 90th percentile. To give some perspective that is borderline intellectual disability level on one hand and gifted on the other end. As I mentioned previously, my best scores on the WAIS were also oddly on the working memory Index, including arithmetic and digit span.


Interesting. So, I scored in the 90+ percentile on three of the WAIS sub-test scores: Arithmetic (99%), Matrix Reasoning (98%), Visual Puzzles (91%). On all other sub-tests, I scored in the 60s to 80s (percentile wise). With the lowest being Digit Span (63%).

What's really funny about the memory stuff is, before I took the test, I didn't realize how poor my working memory was. It simply wasn't something I paid attention to. Now, I have a better understanding of how it impacts all sorts of things.



Rascal77s
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

13 Apr 2014, 12:11 am

Rocket123 wrote:

What's really funny about the memory stuff is, before I took the test, I didn't realize how poor my working memory was. It simply wasn't something I paid attention to. Now, I have a better understanding of how it impacts all sorts of things.


This is what I've been saying for the last couple years on every one of the IQ threads that pop up. IQ tests are meant help people understand weaknesses through subtests so they can improve those weaknesses. FSIQ scores are almost meaningless for anything other than seeking public services.