Marybird wrote:
Yes. For the same reason we tend not to be racist either.
Everyone is equal (including animals). There are no social hierarchies.
I have always seen animals as equals and have related to them that way.
People have told me I should show a dog that I am the dominate one, but I cannot do that and I have never had any problems with dogs.
When I was a kid, my parents used to say that I thought animals were people.
I kind of do think that.
I used to think so, but then after hanging around WrongPlanet for a while and attending a string of autistic meet-ups, that assumption was proven false pretty quickly.
Also homophobia, sexism, and religious intolerance. Not to mention ableism. Oh God ableism. In fact, I'd say that on average, an HFA racist is a notch more obnoxious than an NT racist because of the autistic tendency to obsess over things. A bigoted zealot is going to be all the more zealous if all that hatred is going to get concentrated into their special interests and routines. Then, there's the added factor of having a poorer sense of social tact, so everything they blurt out is going to be ten times as harsh.
But on topic, I actually agree with the notion that for those among us who relate to animals fairly well or better than we relate to humans, is because the social norms, mores, and expectations of contact with other humans (they expect us to 'understand' all the social conventions), are not present when we try to connect to a cat or a bird or a rabbit or a turtle etc. I think much the same goes for the animals themselves though. I get along with my aunt's cat like a house on fire, but that's also because she doesn't have to pretend I'm a cat and do all the cat-specific social stuff. We can just recline on the couch together, not understanding each other's language, but understanding each other on a more primal plane, if that makes sense.
_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action