Page 2 of 2 [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

1401b
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2012
Age: 125
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,590

08 Aug 2014, 1:33 pm

Great minds think alike.

But fools seldom differ.


_________________
(14.01.b) cogito ergo sum confusus


neobluex
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 May 2013
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 589
Location: Argentina

08 Aug 2014, 1:46 pm

My opinion: Neurotypical is a person wich is not impaired to live in a society due to neural states and does not need support to do so.

Neural "states" includes cognition, emotions, brain-death, epilepsy, etc, etc, etc.



IntellectualCat
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 175

08 Aug 2014, 6:53 pm

I define neurotypical as having neurological traits that are at or close to the mean if the traits have a normal distribution or to the modes if the traits have a bimodal distribution.



Here
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 379
Location: California

08 Aug 2014, 7:02 pm

Wikipedia comes through in defining the term 'Neurotypical.'

Discussion mainly deals with the semantics of the term 'Neurotypical.' It's interesting to read though the listing esp. with gleaning information from the references.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotypical



KimD
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 583

10 Aug 2014, 6:13 pm

[i]

olympiadis wrote:
KimD wrote:
olympiadis wrote:


When tests are applied to humans in a lab setting, this is shown to be true without fail.
They will answer a questionnaire in a way that suggests individual control, but when later placed within a group, their behaviors completely follow the system control. The individuals normally seem shocked when viewing a video of the testing process and often claim that the events never happened that way.


What type of questionnaire and what type of group event?

(Apologies to Norny--this is somewhat off-topic)


Pretty much ALL of them.
If you're curious about the particular ones I had in mind while writing that, then pm me please.

For a more general answer I would say for you to read about the Eichmann experiment performed by Stanley Milgram.
That is just one, but a very revealing example of what I'm talking about.


-after the test:
...but I was only doing it because I was told to.
...uuh, I thought you said you were in control of your decisions and actions before the test?


I actually was familiar with these studies and agree that they're a terrible testament to what people can do when they feel threatened or pressured to obey directions that they would rather disobey, but I can't find out if any of the participants were asked IF they specifically lost "control". There's a difference.