Lazenca_x wrote:
:P Wow! i never thought about it in that way. thanx a lot.That clarifies a lot of things that have been bugging me over the last few years. It actually makes you think doesn't it - if you are missing a component then you cannot make whatever it is that you are trying to make work even though you know that it should work (not sure if you understand). I'm actually beggining to like this site even more. There are so many useful/helpful people out there who actually get what i am trying to say- which is a first in my case
almost like a banter of logic ,,, to provide an understanding. -We used many a technique/language to arrive to a conlcusion on the problem. -ain't logic great - now we just have to get the NT's to be intersted, just ever so slightly.