Joe90 wrote:
Agemaki wrote:
I was undiagnosed most of my life got by without accommodations. I had no developmental delays as a child and I generally excelled at school. I suppose one could argue that the fact that my disability was not recognized suggests that I was "mild." Certainly by the normalcy standards of public education you were "normal" enough to not require attention if you could talk and write your name. Is everyone who is diagnosed as an adult "mild" by virtue of the fact that they escaped diagnosis in their early years?
I was diagnosed when I was 8, which I don't understand, because I am very mild. I developed typically as a baby and showed no signs to cause concern to my parents. I feel that being diagnosed at 8 is way too early for someone like me. And I'm female too. Usually females go unnoticed.
Opposite situation for me. I cried very little as a baby, I showed all the signs of autism as a toddler (e.g. stacking, collecting, lack of imaginary play and interaction with other kids etc) other than speech delay and yet I'm only just getting diagnosed. My parents never flagged it up because they saw it as a "personality".
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Also my mum has a distorted view; the only high functioning people with autism she knows are at her work - in science, very smart, very high functioning people. Those people right at the edge of the autistic spectrum are what she believes I have. She seems to see it as something you "grow out of". I'm undergoing a process now that should have happened 15 years ago, and as such I haven't had early intervention needed and my life is pretty screwed at the moment.
![Neutral :|](./images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif)
The people at CAHMS can't understand why not only did my parents never flag this up, but the school never did either. Being a girl sucks.