magic wrote:
And even if somebody smiles just to create a good mood, what is wrong with that?
This reminds me of a scientific article about autistics and NTs and intention and outcome.
I will describe the test.
There is a person A, who has a cup of sugar.
There is a person B, to whom the cup of sugar is given.
It turns out there was not sugar in the cup, instead it was arsenic (pretty stupid mistake) and person B has died.
The question is "Has B commited an immoral deed?"
When the NTs and the people with Asperger's syndrome were posed this question, all (I think) chose Yes, if B knew the cup was filled with arsenic.
When told that B did not know, the NTs chose No, but the people with Asperger's syndrome chose Yes.
Opinions
This was also how I thought about this.
This is also the problem I have with white lies.
The excuse people tend to use for white lies is exactly that: "And even if somebody lies just to create a good mood, what is wrong with that?"
I have an immense moral aversion against all kinds of lying (I see all lying as the worst kind of lying, because lying is bad)
I think that creating a good mood without conflicts is not nearly a good enough excuse to justify lying.