My Theory on Facial Expression and Staring

Page 2 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 112
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

13 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm

GodzillaWoman wrote:
ResilientBrilliance wrote:
I used to think I could read facial expressions until a few months ago when I came up with my theory. I started looking into flat affect and tried to search online for a face with flat affect. According to WiseGeek, this woman's facial expression is result of flat affect. She looked perfectly normal to me. I wish I had a friend to ask if they find the woman creepy, scary, violent, etc. Anyway, it's interesting you use the term microexpressions. I read a book called Mr Penumbra's 24 hour Bookstore and the protagonist kept mentioning micromuscles. I probably can't detect those accurately.


We may not be able to read microexpressions. There was an interesting segment on PBS' The Brain the other day, in which John Elder Robison was undergoing some sort of magnetic brain scan at Harvard Medical School. It accidentally caused him to suddenly be aware of micro expressions for the first time. It wasn't clear if it made him any more able to interpret them, and it didn't seem to make his face as expressive as most people's.

Here is just the Robison clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEQKvrILN3U
Here is the whole episode: http://www.pbs.org/the-brain-with-david-eagleman/episodes/why-do-i-need-you/

The entire episode is worth watching. The bit that really blew my mind is that NTs can read an expression in 30 milliseconds!! ! So it's likely that for them, it's automatic and not consciously done. I usually spend 2-10 seconds trying to read people's expressions, and I still can get similar expressions confused. In the PBS episode, they did one study in which they temporarily immobilized people's faces with Botox. Freezing their faces actually impaired their abilities to interpret OTHER people's expressions--the two are definitely linked. I've read that one of the first things a baby does is to "mirror" other people's expressions. It may be to cement child-parent bonds, or to learn how expressions work.

I have Paul Ekman's book, Emotions Revealed, on my reading list, to see if I can improve my expression reading (and expressions for myself). http://www.amazon.com/Emotions-Revealed-Second-Recognizing-Communication/dp/0805083391/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1447438088&sr=1-1&keywords=paul+ekman


THAT FIRST CLIP IS HOLY-FVCKING-MOLEY AWESOME 8O 8O 8O 8O :!: :!: :!: :!:

TMS PERMANENTLY ALTERED HIS BRAIN 8O 8O 8O 8O

I NEVER KNEW THAT WAS POSSIBLE 8O 8O 8O

WOWOW 8O

Thank you soooo much :D :D :D :D :nerdy: :nerdy: :nerdy:



GodzillaWoman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 742
Location: MD, USA

13 Nov 2015, 3:10 pm

slave wrote:
THAT FIRST CLIP IS HOLY-FVCKING-MOLEY AWESOME 8O 8O 8O 8O :!: :!: :!: :!:

TMS PERMANENTLY ALTERED HIS BRAIN 8O 8O 8O 8O

I NEVER KNEW THAT WAS POSSIBLE 8O 8O 8O

WOWOW 8O

Thank you soooo much :D :D :D :D :nerdy: :nerdy: :nerdy:


There's more info about it here: http://jerobison.blogspot.com/p/use-of-tms-transcranial-magnetic.html
and it is the subject of his next book, Switched On, coming out early next year. I found myself feeling a bit uneasy about the idea of subjecting my brain to something that might alter it, and was concerned about possible side effects or long-term problems. I'm like, well maybe, but I want to know more. The idea of changing a part of myself, even if it's for the better, is rather scary.


_________________
Diagnosed Bipolar II in 2012, Autism spectrum disorder (moderate) & ADHD in 2015.


goatfish57
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 621
Location: In a village in La Mancha whose name I cannot recall

13 Nov 2015, 3:43 pm

GodzillaWoman wrote:
slave wrote:
THAT FIRST CLIP IS HOLY-FVCKING-MOLEY AWESOME 8O 8O 8O 8O :!: :!: :!: :!:

TMS PERMANENTLY ALTERED HIS BRAIN 8O 8O 8O 8O

I NEVER KNEW THAT WAS POSSIBLE 8O 8O 8O

WOWOW 8O

Thank you soooo much :D :D :D :D :nerdy: :nerdy: :nerdy:


There's more info about it here: http://jerobison.blogspot.com/p/use-of-tms-transcranial-magnetic.html
and it is the subject of his next book, Switched On, coming out early next year. I found myself feeling a bit uneasy about the idea of subjecting my brain to something that might alter it, and was concerned about possible side effects or long-term problems. I'm like, well maybe, but I want to know more. The idea of changing a part of myself, even if it's for the better, is rather scary.


Fantastic, thanks for the link


_________________
Rdos: ND 133/200, NT 75/200

Not Diagnosed and Not Sure


ResilientBrilliance
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 280

13 Nov 2015, 7:41 pm

GodzillaWoman wrote:
ResilientBrilliance wrote:
I used to think I could read facial expressions until a few months ago when I came up with my theory. I started looking into flat affect and tried to search online for a face with flat affect. According to WiseGeek, this woman's facial expression is result of flat affect. She looked perfectly normal to me. I wish I had a friend to ask if they find the woman creepy, scary, violent, etc. Anyway, it's interesting you use the term microexpressions. I read a book called Mr Penumbra's 24 hour Bookstore and the protagonist kept mentioning micromuscles. I probably can't detect those accurately.


We may not be able to read microexpressions. There was an interesting segment on PBS' The Brain the other day, in which John Elder Robison was undergoing some sort of magnetic brain scan at Harvard Medical School. It accidentally caused him to suddenly be aware of micro expressions for the first time. It wasn't clear if it made him any more able to interpret them, and it didn't seem to make his face as expressive as most people's.

Here is just the Robison clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEQKvrILN3U
Here is the whole episode: http://www.pbs.org/the-brain-with-david-eagleman/episodes/why-do-i-need-you/

The entire episode is worth watching. The bit that really blew my mind is that NTs can read an expression in 30 milliseconds!! ! So it's likely that for them, it's automatic and not consciously done. I usually spend 2-10 seconds trying to read people's expressions, and I still can get similar expressions confused. In the PBS episode, they did one study in which they temporarily immobilized people's faces with Botox. Freezing their faces actually impaired their abilities to interpret OTHER people's expressions--the two are definitely linked. I've read that one of the first things a baby does is to "mirror" other people's expressions. It may be to cement child-parent bonds, or to learn how expressions work.

I have Paul Ekman's book, Emotions Revealed, on my reading list, to see if I can improve my expression reading (and expressions for myself). http://www.amazon.com/Emotions-Revealed-Second-Recognizing-Communication/dp/0805083391/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1447438088&sr=1-1&keywords=paul+ekman

Yes, I can tell that their reactions are automatic. There is no logic in it which is why they can do it instantly. I also think they can see expressions from afar.

The Botox experiment sounds very interesting. I'm surprised that there's a link between reading and interpreting facial expressions. That may explain why I'm not expressive in the same way as most people and I can't read their expressions either.
As for mirroring, I didn't know it had to do with a parent-child connection. I've never had a connection with my mother and don't have a connection with any human. I don't mirror people. Which reminds me, I realized one day that people mirror smiles. Like if they see someone else smiling they start to smile. I am very aware that I do not do that naturally. I can look at someone, see them smiling, and not do anything.

GodzillaWoman wrote:
slave wrote:
THAT FIRST CLIP IS HOLY-FVCKING-MOLEY AWESOME 8O 8O 8O 8O :!: :!: :!: :!:

TMS PERMANENTLY ALTERED HIS BRAIN 8O 8O 8O 8O

I NEVER KNEW THAT WAS POSSIBLE 8O 8O 8O

WOWOW 8O

Thank you soooo much :D :D :D :D :nerdy: :nerdy: :nerdy:


There's more info about it here: http://jerobison.blogspot.com/p/use-of-tms-transcranial-magnetic.html
and it is the subject of his next book, Switched On, coming out early next year. I found myself feeling a bit uneasy about the idea of subjecting my brain to something that might alter it, and was concerned about possible side effects or long-term problems. I'm like, well maybe, but I want to know more. The idea of changing a part of myself, even if it's for the better, is rather scary.

My first thought was "the experiment permanently altered his brain??" That sounds very scary to me as well. Especially waking up one day and everyone's faces look different. I wonder if it felt like a sudden superpower lol.



zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 64
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

13 Nov 2015, 7:49 pm

That's a bit scary. On all levels......


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


Earthling
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2015
Posts: 3,450

13 Nov 2015, 7:51 pm

Humph, even if this would work on me, I still wouldn't be able to "read" people.
Why?
Because my vision is abysmal. No matter how well I can "read", I just can't see.
Sometimes I wonder if I'm just blind, ADD, socially inept, anxious and a few other things, but otherwise neurotypical. :?



GodzillaWoman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 742
Location: MD, USA

14 Nov 2015, 3:13 am

zkydz wrote:
That's a bit scary. On all levels......


Yeah, he mentions on his Blogspot that it improved the face reading but made other things worse. He doesn't specify what. I'd hate to become better at face reading only to make my sensory sensitivities vastly worse, for instance, or worsen my ADHD or executive functioning. I can get by without face reading, but if I got any more disorganized or indecisive at work, I'd probably be fired. I think I'll pass on the brain tinkering, thanks.


_________________
Diagnosed Bipolar II in 2012, Autism spectrum disorder (moderate) & ADHD in 2015.


zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 64
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

14 Nov 2015, 4:33 am

I was thinking about this as I went to sleep. It just seems scary to have anybody tinker with the brain like this. If there are ANY mistakes or problems, there ain't no 'undo' or fixing it.

Also, even with the difficulties I've had in life, I still prefer to stick with the devil I know. I don't need to learn how to understand all new things and THEN compensate for that also.

Spending time figuring all the new characteristics,"What am I feeling and is that a new 'thing'", and then have to adapt to the new changes.

Just so scary on so many levels.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


dobyfm
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 291

14 Nov 2015, 5:48 am

Very interesting what you wrote! Facial expression as well as body language is very important in public. It is the way of letting other people judge you (I know, a bit messed up), but it is also the way to let people feel comfortable around you.



zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 64
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

14 Nov 2015, 8:45 am

dobyfm wrote:
Very interesting what you wrote! Facial expression as well as body language is very important in public. It is the way of letting other people judge you (I know, a bit messed up), but it is also the way to let people feel comfortable around you.



I don't think it's all that messed up. For instance, I think of it this way:

My wife is Chinese, so therefore, I've been to China. Of course we went to markets and such to buy things. Now, I'm American. So, it was a bit interesting to see the cultural differences on such a basic level as numbers.

There are many dialects in China. As my wife says "A different way of speaking every ten miles". But, they have standards of communications. Counting, or number symbols can be done by hand.

Now, everybody there understands and uses those symbols. Once I learned that, I could communicate as well with basic number systems. However forget speaking it. In speech, they actually have two number systems I can glean. There is the number 2 for basic counting. But if you want 2 of something, it goes into different words.

We are a small minority of the population. We have to learn what we can and accept certain things. We also can't pass judgement on something they do naturally and take for granted.

I do expect though that with proper diagnoses and education, the population at large will eventually, I hope, have a bit better understanding of us and how we are. I think we do make them uncomfortable because they can't read us any better than we can read them.

Just be warned, there are cultures that excel at facial reading and body language. Those are the people who you must watch out for because they can read us very well and that opens us up to being taken advantage of.

They can see all those little things that I can read about, understand, but never put into practice. Sort of like knowing how to read, but being blind.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 112
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

14 Nov 2015, 5:15 pm

zkydz wrote:
That's a bit scary. On all levels......


this is why i was so 8O shocked!

the implications and potential pos. and neg. applications are HUGE!

What if their aim was off and they perm altered the wrong part of his brain?!?!

What unknown impact has this had on him?!

Look, I have studied Neuroscience in Uni and we do NOT understand the brain well enough to tinker.

Will this be used on prisoners? dissidents?

How much change can be made to the brain?

Does it wear off?

What specifically happens to the neurons and other cells?

I could list 50 other Q's, but you get the point.



slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 112
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

14 Nov 2015, 5:16 pm

GodzillaWoman wrote:
slave wrote:
THAT FIRST CLIP IS HOLY-FVCKING-MOLEY AWESOME 8O 8O 8O 8O :!: :!: :!: :!:

TMS PERMANENTLY ALTERED HIS BRAIN 8O 8O 8O 8O

I NEVER KNEW THAT WAS POSSIBLE 8O 8O 8O

WOWOW 8O

Thank you soooo much :D :D :D :D :nerdy: :nerdy: :nerdy:


There's more info about it here: http://jerobison.blogspot.com/p/use-of-tms-transcranial-magnetic.html
and it is the subject of his next book, Switched On, coming out early next year. I found myself feeling a bit uneasy about the idea of subjecting my brain to something that might alter it, and was concerned about possible side effects or long-term problems. I'm like, well maybe, but I want to know more. The idea of changing a part of myself, even if it's for the better, is rather scary.


Many thanks :D :nerdy:



ResilientBrilliance
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 280

14 Nov 2015, 7:40 pm

dobyfm wrote:
Very interesting what you wrote! Facial expression as well as body language is very important in public. It is the way of letting other people judge you (I know, a bit messed up), but it is also the way to let people feel comfortable around you.

That's an interesting way to look at it. I don't aim to make people uncomfortable. If they are uncomfortable about my facial expression when I haven't even seen them (until they start moving awkwardly around me), then I don't think that's right. It's something I have to accept since it's human nature and not going to change.

zkydz wrote:
dobyfm wrote:
Very interesting what you wrote! Facial expression as well as body language is very important in public. It is the way of letting other people judge you (I know, a bit messed up), but it is also the way to let people feel comfortable around you.



I don't think it's all that messed up. For instance, I think of it this way:

My wife is Chinese, so therefore, I've been to China. Of course we went to markets and such to buy things. Now, I'm American. So, it was a bit interesting to see the cultural differences on such a basic level as numbers.

There are many dialects in China. As my wife says "A different way of speaking every ten miles". But, they have standards of communications. Counting, or number symbols can be done by hand.

Now, everybody there understands and uses those symbols. Once I learned that, I could communicate as well with basic number systems. However forget speaking it. In speech, they actually have two number systems I can glean. There is the number 2 for basic counting. But if you want 2 of something, it goes into different words.

We are a small minority of the population. We have to learn what we can and accept certain things. We also can't pass judgement on something they do naturally and take for granted.

I do expect though that with proper diagnoses and education, the population at large will eventually, I hope, have a bit better understanding of us and how we are. I think we do make them uncomfortable because they can't read us any better than we can read them.

Just be warned, there are cultures that excel at facial reading and body language. Those are the people who you must watch out for because they can read us very well and that opens us up to being taken advantage of.

They can see all those little things that I can read about, understand, but never put into practice. Sort of like knowing how to read, but being blind.

Yup very good points. People do it so naturally that they deny that they judge others based on what their face looks like. People denying that they judge based on facial expression is definitely messed up.



zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 64
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

14 Nov 2015, 7:50 pm

I love the Hong Kong movies of the 70's through the 90s. The mugging and strong facial expressions were easier for me. Some of them are zany comedies (I mean really wacky stuff sometimes) that were so telegraphed it was very enjoyable to watch.

I have a much harder time with the more stoic Japanese movies. Although I have seen a few zany Japanese movies. One was really wacky...A time travel story using a washing machine as the time travel device.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


piiigs
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2015
Age: 38
Posts: 43
Location: Norway

15 Nov 2015, 5:06 am

I put fake smile on when I am facing my son. He starts crying if I don't.



ResilientBrilliance
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 280

15 Nov 2015, 9:09 am

Earthling wrote:
Humph, even if this would work on me, I still wouldn't be able to "read" people.
Why?
Because my vision is abysmal. No matter how well I can "read", I just can't see.
Sometimes I wonder if I'm just blind, ADD, socially inept, anxious and a few other things, but otherwise neurotypical. :?

I don't have good vision either, and I do think it makes socializing even more difficult. I don't have good peripheral vision, but it seems like people are capable of reading the facial expressions of people using their peripheral! A lot of socializing seems to be visual. They call it "nonverbal" cues but a more accurate term may be "visual" cues.

piiigs wrote:
I put fake smile on when I am facing my son. He starts crying if I don't.

I think it's good to do a fake smile if you can smile on cue.