Page 2 of 2 [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 64
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

17 Jan 2016, 10:53 am

I test out as INTJ consistently. But I do find some of the questions funny.

Here's one: The clutter thing. I like MY clutter. I do not function as well in a properly cleaned, 'organized' setting because it's someone else's organization.

There are others that bothered me too like about having a job done versus the starting a job. I do like to have jobs finished. They are done, out of the way, etc. But I love to start jobs and all that problem solving. But I absolutely hate the part of a job or project that is the 'tying up loose ends' part. Tedium galore with me and boredom.

I guess I hate questions with only two answer choices when I'm actually right down the middle on a lot of things.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 64
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

17 Jan 2016, 11:59 am

I made this second post because I read something that amused me in the article mentioned.

Quote:
This is why INTJs must pair their Driver process with the Co-Pilot of Extraverted Thinking, or “Effectiveness.” The only way to truly know if those patterns have merit is if they play out in the ‘outer world’. If they work, awesome! That was a great new pattern. If they fail, then it’s back to the internal drawing board.

For an INTP, the outer world isn’t where thoughts are vetted. In fact, INTPs couple their Accuracy with Extraverted Intuition, or what we call “Exploration.” The world outside of themselves is where intriguing new patterns are observed, and it’s up to them to make sense of what those possibilities could mean.
I actually fit the second definition much better (at least as I read it) by the way it describes the way I access my observations and patterning and then apply it. I can't think of any time that I've devised anything cold and then tested it in the world. I've always observed, mulled, applied and then tested. I think that is why I loop through things most every day. What did I see? What did they do? How did they respond? What did I see that I want to apply and then how to apply it? How does all of this fit together?

Edit: Oh! And this is definitely me. I even posted it in another thread about how I laugh when proven wrong.

"Conversely, the more mature an INTP becomes, the more they’re delighted at being proven wrong. That’s the outer world helping them cleanse data they may have grown attached to / become biased toward!"

And on the INTJ type:
"Ultimately, the proof is in Effectiveness, and you’ll see how wrong you are when the outer world plays it all out."
Is also me...I think I'm just confused as much as anything by now.......

arrrrgghhhhh!! !! !


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


nerdygirl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,645
Location: In the land of abstractions and ideas.

17 Jan 2016, 2:59 pm

BeaArthur wrote:
nerdygirl wrote:
I have taken at least 20 different personality tests online, plus the real MBTI test I took in college. I *always* score INTP. The description fits me. I don't necessarily like it and have tried scoring differently, which is why I have taken so many tests. Still INTP....


If 50 % of test takers change one or more of their codes on re-test, then 50 % of them don't change. Obviously, you are one of the latter half.

The stuff I said about test validity is absolutely no commentary on the individuals who take the test and do or do not change on re-test. It's empirical, i.e., evidence-based and statistical. Some tests have a very high test-retest validity and others do not. Generally, this tells us more about the test than about the people.


I took no offense at all. I was just sharing my experience.
Your response reminds me that I had more to say about the test. I agree that other tests are probably better, but I do like how quick and easy it is to say I'm an INTP than to pull out the spectrum graph thing that I have done and try to explain that.



Lunami
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2016
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 26
Location: Georgia, USA

17 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm

I bounce between INTP and INFP, but get INFP more often. I think INFP fits me more in general, but I also view myself as more logical than what most INFPs seem to be described as. So honestly I'm not sure.


_________________
@-;---


e4c5
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 15
Location: United States

17 Jan 2016, 7:23 pm

Lunami wrote:
I bounce between INTP and INFP, but get INFP more often. I think INFP fits me more in general, but I also view myself as more logical than what most INFPs seem to be described as. So honestly I'm not sure.


That explanation is very consistent with what I said about how aspies of the feeling type tend to behave more similarly to thinkers.



Grammar Geek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2015
Age: 29
Posts: 889
Location: Missouri

18 Jan 2016, 11:03 pm

I find it odd how any Aspie can be a feeler, seeing as how logic is so ingrained in our minds (edit: just saw the post above. That makes sense). But everyone's different of course. I've taken this test many times, and the result never changes: ISTJ.