Are my non-autistic children going to suffer?
BirdInFlight
Veteran
Joined: 8 Jun 2013
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,501
Location: If not here, then where?
I stand corrected; I didn't see that sentence -- so that person did say the autistic person will be suffering "the most."
Now that I come to revisit my thoughts on this a while later from initially posting, however........why would it be so unreasonable to speculate that perhaps the autistic child or person might actually be suffering "the most"?
For all we know, maybe that is true. Nobody can know. For all as bad as it must feel to be a parent struggling with a severely affected child, maybe it's still not as bad as what the kid is going through.
And why does that instantly have to be consigned to the scrapheap of "oh poor little autistic" self-pitying territory? Why can't it be legitimate to acknowledge that maybe it is worst of all for the person with autism?
That doesn't have to be the same thing as saying he or she is helpless, has no future, and all the other negative things someone on this thread condemned the idea as inherently having.
It doesn't have to be any of those things except saying that why not? Why not entertain that maybe IT IS "the most" suffering for that person? And that they do have a tougher row to hoe than the person without autism?
That's not buying into Autism Speaks BS, it's just a stand alone acknowledgement that if this is a suffering competition how in hell does a person with normal functioning get a free pass at saying theirs is "the most" and not the person with the condition?
Why is it okay for, say, a parent or sibling to be "woe is me I'm probably suffering the most" but not okay for anyone to allow that the same might be truer for the person actually LIVING the autism inside their skin?
Now that I come to revisit my thoughts on this a while later from initially posting, however........why would it be so unreasonable to speculate that perhaps the autistic child or person might actually be suffering "the most"?
For all we know, maybe that is true. Nobody can know. For all as bad as it must feel to be a parent struggling with a severely affected child, maybe it's still not as bad as what the kid is going through.
And why does that instantly have to be consigned to the scrapheap of "oh poor little autistic" self-pitying territory? Why can't it be legitimate to acknowledge that maybe it is worst of all for the person with autism?
That doesn't have to be the same thing as saying he or she is helpless, has no future, and all the other negative things someone on this thread condemned the idea as inherently having.
It doesn't have to be any of those things except saying that why not? Why not entertain that maybe IT IS "the most" suffering for that person? And that they do have a tougher row to hoe than the person without autism?
That's not buying into Autism Speaks BS, it's just a stand alone acknowledgement that if this is a suffering competition how in hell does a person with normal functioning get a free pass at saying theirs is "the most" and not the person with the condition?
Why is it okay for, say, a parent or sibling to be "woe is me I'm probably suffering the most" but not okay for anyone to allow that the same might be truer for the person actually LIVING the autism inside their skin?
Because over time, this attitude consigns us to the status of "other." It denies us basic participation in community - that acknowledgement that we are all - ALL - more alike than we are different.
I have to say, this is a weird turn of postings. Nobody made any "instant" anythings. These discussions happened over days. That is not instant.
Also, YAWN, we have had this conversation literally dozens of times. Do you really think that this is the first time for any of us older autistic people? Over and over again, we have worked out the deeper meaning of how we use English to express our comfort, or discomfort, with the presence of a person with disabilities in our lives. We've analyzed this stuff very thoroughly. Did you really think that I just made that whole post up off the top of my head? I've answered your question, almost exactly the same question, at least three times just this year.
I call this kind of thinking The Suffering Olympics. As if some people win by suffering the most. And you know, its a pretty common game of the young. Its a game that I played often and well. There's nothing particularly wrong with playing it. But I do think that it is our responsibility, as the elder generation of sorts, to guide people towards a more productive way of being in life. In the Suffering Olympics, everyone is a loser. It doesn't pay to play.
Yes why does feelings need to be invalidated if someone is suffering more than them?
I never like the who has it worse contest. It happens in everything about anything like who can get PTSD and who is allowed to get it, or who is allowed to have hurt feelings and be traumatized or who is allowed to be overwhelmed and tired, etc. People who participate in this contest end up lacking empathy and invalidating people's experience and their feelings and not seeing it from their perspective.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
I know what it is like for me when I have a meltdown, I usually either freak out, or run away. It might be better for you just to see what he does on his own then decide if you need to do anything to help with that. He might figure it out on his own. He might need help. That's my suggestion. His meltdowns might be different from my meltdowns. You might also want to learn more about meltdowns..
_________________
ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup or by email at [email protected]
Yes. If they recognize a meltdown and have a plan for everyone in the family when it happens, its pretty likely everyone will be completely fine. Its when you continue to push a person having a meltdown that violence tends to occur. (And this is so only in people who haven't figured out how to hold it back. Most autistic adults no longer aggress when they melt down. Its pretty rare, actually, for that to happen after adolescence.)
The challenge with younger siblings is getting them to recognize when its time to stop interacting with their brother, and when they can just be kids around him. Its OK, 90% of the time, to just play around and have fun with him. They just have to learn what that last 10% looks like.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Podcast About 'Telepathic' Autistic Children popular |
Yesterday, 12:55 pm |
Keir Starmer - Abuse of Autistic children must stop |
04 Dec 2024, 7:27 pm |
Should we be obligated to have children ? |
01 Jan 2025, 9:36 am |
Repetitive behaviours as children |
08 Nov 2024, 1:54 am |