Dear_one wrote:
AspieUtah wrote:
Dear_one wrote:
I do try to avoid pride, but I'd be a lot more tempted if I'd done something future Aspies might hear about. I assumed that a prize-winning prototype would have had an effect on industrial history, but so far, it only has obscure web pages:
http://www.compositesworld.com/columns/ ... le-history The NT committees are creeping toward the same goal, but it may take them a century to do what I did in a year. Maybe if I'd patented it, they'd think it worth stealing.
Very interesting article! It appears that you are in the same inventive crowd as Alan Turing.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Gee, thanks! Alan was assassinated, IMHO, because MI6 was afraid that he could be blackmailed for being gay, and give away state secrets. Someone who wants to poison theirself uses a drink, not half of a poisoned apple. They almost always leave a note, too.
Turing's family thought he "made a mistake" by eating frequently while working with chemicals. Maybe, but this is the man who
knew what his "machine" would do before he even built it. Error was simply not something he allowed in his life. Given the penchant among the MI6 crowd to "clean house" when they saw the need, Occam's razor gets a front-row seat in the debate, doesn't it? No, the idea of a suicide is simply too "neat" an answer. In my survey and commentary about Turing from 2016 (
viewtopic.php?t=322339 ), I wrote simply that he "died on June 7, 1954, from cyanide poisoning[.]" There were too many possible alternatives to suicide than I was willing to accept.