Of course, this has nothing to do with autism.
I'm more like OK with numbers in general, good at analyzing and figuring certain things out, and bad at certain types of 'planning'.
Several accounts and outcome says I'm good at logic, math, and computers, but OK with chess.
Yet I'd say I'm good with logic as long as I recall the right terms and symbols, and constantly see what has been said.
Bad at logic if I don't know or forgot that X isn't there, Y is Y, or even Z exists somewhere -- even if I knew that X and Y is Z.
Good at maths as long as I'm looking at it, recall what the formula is, and seen it's patterns. Geometry would be better.
Bad at maths because I'd keep dropping bits of numbers in my head, couldn't solve it without writing it, or in some cases I have to forget my entire being just to hold onto two 3-digit numbers along with it's answers in my head because if I get the numbers missing or recalled wrong -- I'd get wrong answers.
Good at computers as long as instructions or descriptions aren't being vague, otherwise I may do the same mistakes, or if it involves programing - as long as I'm able to recall what terms are for.
Bad at it because I forgot that files and folders are placed there, or that X should or shouldn't be with Y, even if I know what X and Y is and what it was for.
OK at chess when it comes to general population, but suck at it compared to an average player. I wouldn't know or feel if I'd be good at it if I have the interest. I usually end up winging it.
Overall;
I may be good at all of them because I'm good with patterns and knowing how things work. My visuals are good, so does anything nonverbal.
I may suck at all of them because of bad working and short term memory. What I noticed or knew, even if I knew what I'm supposed to do with it wouldn't mattered anymore.