jimmyjazzuk wrote:
Out of interest why no tats?
If you don't mind me answering I had a similar policy. There are a number of reasons:
1) In my opinion, they are U-G-L-Y.
2) They are permanent and I am someone who second guesses literally everything.
3) They reduce employability in many fields at a time it is hard to find a stable job.
4) They are insanely expensive to remove.
5) Rather than being a sign of individuality it is a sign of someone following the crowd.
Controversial opinion here, but I find it ironic how it I took out a washable marker and drew artwork on myself people would think I was crazy yet putting a permanent drawing under your skin is considered normal.
I had a similar policy with exotic piercings (I wouldn't date one woman who looked like a great catch because I couldn't ignore her ridiculous eyebrow ring) but at least they can be removed and will eventually close over. Having said all that, I could certainly accept a small ankle tattoo a lot more than a giant one on the neck or face.
As for the topic at hand, I was almost 30 and in hindsight it really wasn't that big of a deal: sure it was enjoyable but the risk of STDs, pregnancy, etc was also there. I honestly can't see how anyone could shame someone for being a virgin anyway as there is absolutely no way to know.