Page 2 of 2 [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

17 Jan 2021, 10:29 pm

CockneyRebel wrote:
I also agree with BeaArthur. I'd also like to bring forth that not all therapists are bad. I had a good shrink for two years recently. There are people who have bad experiences in therapy. I think the best thing we can do is learn from each other and get along.
I don't. Oh well.

I do wonder what could have happened if I were old enough for TheraDate and it existed in my city at the time. 8)



hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

23 Jan 2021, 3:15 am

Aspie1 wrote:
[

I get it. You had a good experience with therapy, because you were good at it from the get-go. You knew how to get the therapist to help you. But in order to make that happen, you have to know now to navigate therapy in the first place. Which means telling the therapist the right things at the right time in the right tone of voice in the right context. That's a lot to memorize, even for us aspies. Somehow, you were able to do everything correctly; props to you for that. And your therapist responded in kind and helped you, thus doing everything right too. But for the rest of us, extra hints for navigating therapy can be a godsend.

I disagree with "therapist didn't help me get a girlfriend". Back in 2002, one psychologist in New York actually tried that! 8O He operated a service called TheraDate, where he worked as a matchmaker, and set up therapy patients on dates with each other, based on their patient chart similarities. (Given the time period, it was for straight people only.) His intentions were good and ingenious. He believed that a real romantic relationship was gonna be more beneficial for patients than repetitive sessions of talking about feelings in a sterile office.

Sadly, the service folded very quickly. Using a matchmaking service carried a heavy stigma back then. Ethical issues arose as well, due to the possible "dual relationship" of a therapist also working with a matchmaker. So the demand never reached critical mass. It'd be really interesting how TheraDate 2.0 can pan out today.


This helps explain your perspective a bit better to me.

I have a similar feeling about small talk. Things like you have to begin with, "hello, how are you?" Even though they will lie and say they are fine.

The difference with therapy was that I was completely open and honest. I didn't use any techniques like I do with small talk.

I understand now that you're looking for a similar key. If you say this thing, then you'll get a good reaction.

However, that's not how therapy is meant to work. You're supposed to be honest and a good therapist will encourage you and draw you out if they don't understand what you're saying.

I'll give you an example of how I got something wrong. The therapist wanted me to write how I feel through the day as different things happen. I had been discussing my physical illnesses with her, so just assumed she meant I was to write down how I was physically feeling.

Wrong. She meant write down your emotional feelings. She read my homework and rexplained it to me and I had to do it again.

No tricks. Just open communication.

You think you're being helpful offering therapy conversation hacks. But you're really telling people how to be people pleasers. That's not how therapy works. Like, literally, it won't work if you play games with the therapist and tell them what you think they want to hear.



hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

23 Jan 2021, 3:37 am

You're an adult now. You don't need to be a people pleaser with your therapist. Argue with them. Disagree. Be confrontational if you feel like it. Be you.

Don't be a doormat with your therapist.

Edit, when I say confrontational I mean feel free to tell them when you disagree, not shout at them or be belligerent.

I say this because I have a friend who doesn't speak her mind for fear of coming over as confrontational. That's why I'm using the word confrontational.



Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

23 Jan 2021, 9:55 am

hurtloam wrote:
You think you're being helpful offering therapy conversation hacks. But you're really telling people how to be people pleasers. That's not how therapy works. Like, literally, it won't work if you play games with the therapist and tell them what you think they want to hear.
You got only half the equation right. Reread my hacks. Some of them do teach people to please their therapist, as to protect them from the therapist's retaliatory emotional sucker punches during that specific session. But the rest teach people to intimidate their therapist; that's certainly not "pleasing". The goal is to subtly but clearly demonstrate that you can do real damage to their career, if not their mental health too. This reduces the need to "please" them in the first place.

It's plain old business honesty. When you join therapy, you accept a deal: share your feelings correctly, get real help in return. You fulfilled your end of the deal by sharing your feelings and giving correct answers, thanks to the hacks you know. Now, your therapist must fulfill their end of the deal and actually help you, not just make cooing noises. If they deny you help, they're dishonestly breaking the deal: So you can deliver the consequences, like give them an emotional sucker punch, and/or report them to the state. Those other hacks ensure your therapist knows you can do that.



Dear_one
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2008
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,721
Location: Where the Great Plains meet the Northern Pines

23 Jan 2021, 11:26 am

Aspie1 wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
You think you're being helpful offering therapy conversation hacks. But you're really telling people how to be people pleasers. That's not how therapy works. Like, literally, it won't work if you play games with the therapist and tell them what you think they want to hear.
You got only half the equation right. Reread my hacks. Some of them do teach people to please their therapist, as to protect them from the therapist's retaliatory emotional sucker punches during that specific session. But the rest teach people to intimidate their therapist; that's certainly not "pleasing". The goal is to subtly but clearly demonstrate that you can do real damage to their career, if not their mental health too. This reduces the need to "please" them in the first place.

It's plain old business honesty. When you join therapy, you accept a deal: share your feelings correctly, get real help in return. You fulfilled your end of the deal by sharing your feelings and giving correct answers, thanks to the hacks you know. Now, your therapist must fulfill their end of the deal and actually help you, not just make cooing noises. If they deny you help, they're dishonestly breaking the deal: So you can deliver the consequences, like give them an emotional sucker punch, and/or report them to the state. Those other hacks ensure your therapist knows you can do that.


I think you must be assuming that therapy is a science, not an art. You can demand that a sculptor work to the best of their ability, but not that what is created will be what you expected.
In a forced therapy session, hacks can be a necessary counter-force, but once someone is freely seeking change, hacks are just ways to stay stuck in the familiar despair and sabotage the work, while having more to complain about.



Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

23 Jan 2021, 11:58 am

Dear_one wrote:
I think you must be assuming that therapy is a science, not an art. You can demand that a sculptor work to the best of their ability, but not that what is created will be what you expected.
In a forced therapy session, hacks can be a necessary counter-force, but once someone is freely seeking change, hacks are just ways to stay stuck in the familiar despair and sabotage the work, while having more to complain about.
Close, but no cigar. Yeah, I guess therapy is an "art", but I'm well within my rights to expect some degree of help within a reasonably short time frame. That's true even if I chose to go into therapy on my own accord, considering how I'm paying $100+ an hour for the dubious privilege. So, if I'm "sharing my feelings correctly" every week for months on end, and all I get in return is cooing noises and no hint of helpful advice, then hacks become a must. Lies beget lies, after all.



hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

23 Jan 2021, 12:20 pm

There's no point talking to you Aspie1. You've got a really skewed world view.

What we don't want is your vicious negativity harming other people on Wrong planet who could get real help of they weren't swayed by your perverse perspective.



madbutnotmad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,678
Location: Jersey UK

23 Jan 2021, 12:37 pm

I haven't really got involved with any one in terms of political debates on this forum.
I know how the far right work and know that your wasting your time if you think you can talk to these people.

Instead of debating, I perhaps would recommend that you consider writing the following statement or similar
when you experience misinformation / disinformation.

Statement

<I refuse to engage in debate with people who spread misinformation / disinformation>
<I have better things to do with my time than waste it on such morons. I recommend you also do not.
Have a nice day. :-)>



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

23 Jan 2021, 12:43 pm

Fnord wrote:
[rant]

If the Rules and moderators would allow it, I would personally ban five specific individuals for being a$$holes in their support of the soon-to-be-previous Presidential administration.  Not only do they spread lies, but their denial of the truth makes it difficult for the rest of us to carry on reasoned and thoughtful conversations.

[/rant]


Luckily one of them left this forum. If you were talking about that user I am thinking of.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

23 Jan 2021, 12:49 pm

The cancel culture is at it again. :roll: I used to be able to talk freely on here about having sex with escorts. Now I can't even express negative views on therapy without getting jumped on. What changed? :?

You all won! No need to reply. I'm taking the NT-style hint, and leaving this thread. Have a pleasant day, now.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,964
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

23 Jan 2021, 1:00 pm

Aspie1 wrote:
The cancel culture is at it again. :roll:

You all won! I'm taking the NT-style hint, and leaving this thread. Have a pleasant day, now.


Criticizing non-helpful advice that could even be damaging, is cancel culture now?


_________________
We won't go back.


madbutnotmad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,678
Location: Jersey UK

23 Jan 2021, 1:30 pm

I personally am not into cancel culture.

Personally, I find it really frustrating how many countries of the world who run on a party politics infrastructure
use Politically Correctness, Cancelling culture etc. to politically assassinate their opposition.

My post above about simply writing a statement that identifies misinformation when I discover it,
really is aimed at the people who others have mentioned earlier on the thread who are intentionally posting
lies that relate to political events and people involved.

I think that it is counter productive to engage in debate with people who use such strategies such as misinformation to achieve their desired results.

Instead of engaging in debate with them (as these people will never admit they are wrong and will never admit they are lying), I simply recommended that one way to deal with these people are simply to label their actions for what they are, rather than spend all your time and energy trying to convince a person who is lying that they are lying, cause they know their lying, so no matter how much attempts you make to convince them that they are lying, they will never admit to it.

On other matters such as peoples personal opinions on other things in life.
Sure. people all have the right to their opinion, as long as they are not discriminating against any protected party.

Some times people have simply just got to acknowledge that they disagree on this point.
And move on.

Hold hangs, give each other a hug and be happy. :-)



Dear_one
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2008
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,721
Location: Where the Great Plains meet the Northern Pines

23 Jan 2021, 2:18 pm

Aspie1 wrote:
Dear_one wrote:
I think you must be assuming that therapy is a science, not an art. You can demand that a sculptor work to the best of their ability, but not that what is created will be what you expected.
In a forced therapy session, hacks can be a necessary counter-force, but once someone is freely seeking change, hacks are just ways to stay stuck in the familiar despair and sabotage the work, while having more to complain about.
Close, but no cigar. Yeah, I guess therapy is an "art", but I'm well within my rights to expect some degree of help within a reasonably short time frame. That's true even if I chose to go into therapy on my own accord, considering how I'm paying $100+ an hour for the dubious privilege. So, if I'm "sharing my feelings correctly" every week for months on end, and all I get in return is cooing noises and no hint of helpful advice, then hacks become a must. Lies beget lies, after all.


I had a job once evaluating energy-saving devices. About ten percent of the applications were perpetual motion machines of one kind or another. The inventors were sure that they were real, but they were only talking about their own illusions, and ignoring the evidence. Some were keen to commission prototypes, but nobody could have built them as expected.