kraftiekortie wrote:
I would suspect the 40% figure is excessive-----especially within the "autism of today." Which is autism as a "spectrum disorder."
Under the DSM-V, the vast majority of those within "Level One," a smaller majority of those within "Level Two," and the vast majority of those within "Level Three" would probably have "intellectual disability."
I would suspect that 40% of people diagnosed with "autistic disorder" under the DSM-IV would have been 'intellectually-disabled." Very few under "Asperger's Syndrome" would be so classified.
Under the DSM-III criteria, it's quite possible that more than 50% of people so diagnosed were "intellectually-disabled."
Not really this was actually discussed a few days ago you have a baseline figure of 30% in childhood that largely stays the same in adulthood then half of the borderline 25% that splits in adulthood between ID and normal IQ.
It’s all on the CDC website
I was being conservative with the 40% figure
viewtopic.php?t=403841
_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."
- George Bernie Shaw