IsabellaLinton wrote:
The levels don't mean that we "can't" do certain things.
They refer to how much support we'd need to do things without distress.
It's written that way for insurance, in case we go top ourselves.
Statistically, we're at very high risk of suicide.
The diagnostician is free of liability if they've identified our need for support.
Higher risk people get levels 2 or 3.
The rest is on us to find someone or something to give that support.
Ideally, we won't all jump off a bridge if we find such a provider.
Also, "support" doesn't need to be from a person.
It can mean noise cancelling headphones, tinted glasses, etc.
If they've told us we need support they'll also give recommendations.
Then their hands are clean of us, and they can't be sued.
Hm, thank you for the explanation. It makes more sense to me if the support need doesn't refer to being able to do things at all, but rather to the level of difficulty. I've been told by two doctors in the past that having Asperger's syndrome or autism (it was long ago) means you you literally can't do some things, not that they're even extremely challenging. I mean, that's extremely unfair, because having a high IQ and understanding doesn't automatically mean anything is easy or that intelligence is all there is to life and health - that is a nonsense concept by itself, but... here it is, being repeated over and over.
It also makes sense that support can mean things such as things to help with sensory issues.
It's awful how it works with getting rid of responsibility.