Diagnosing dead people with aspergers

Post Reply New Topic

The only two reasons I can think of to diagnose dead people would be (a) closure for family and friends, and (b) for research purposes (eg. diagnosing Einstein with AS in order to finish that last chapter of a book about his life).
No other reasons exist IMO, unless the dead can claim social security based on thier diagnosis or something

Beethoven had various physical ailments and depression, becoming deaf eventually. I always thought Mozart was bi polar or something.

Frankly, it is somewhat irritating. One thing is that there is never enough information to "diagnose" someone who is deceased - they might have had certain symptoms, but without their actually having described to someone how they feel, it is usually impossible to tell whether these symptoms were due to autism, or some other disorder. There is a variety of other conditions that may make a person withdrawn and eccentric, including schizophrenia and the schizotaxic personality disorders. So that any attempts to determine whether someone in the past was autistic or not are commonly reduced to pure speculation, and usually end in some group insisting that the person was autistic just because they *want* him or her to be (no offense to anybody here who likes to guess whether some famous person was autistic or not).

The most annoying thing though is that doing this feels utterly irrelevant. What does it matter whether Mozart, Einstein etc. were or were not autistic? They were who they were, and accomplished whatever they are known for. That's it. I see no point in dwelling on whether they had a condition which may or may not have been there, and there's no way of telling for sure, ever.

Speaking of Einstein, there is a different version popular in Russia states that he had a marked schizoid personality disorder. Which, when it comes to that, is also ENTIRELY likely. So that there's no real way to determine whether it was that or AS in his case, or perhaps both combined.

The bottom line is this: why do this at all? Just so that certain individuals could feel more worthwhile by thinking that they have something in common with famous people like Einstein etc.? A person's value is not determined by whether they are like Einstein or not. It is determined by the plain fact that one is ONESELF.

It's a great search for people to be held up as Heroes to the Cause.

Champions of AS.

Kierkegaard was incredibly pedantic and highly accomplished in his field at a very early age. However, he had serious social difficulties. He had a bizarre obsession with his fiancee, Regina Olsen, whom he rejected. He didn't feel he could be married and be a minister at the same time. However, he writes about her quite a bit.
Some of his social difficulties can be attributed to the social climate of Copenhagen and how caustic it seems, they criticized everything and made sport of it. However, people specifically picked on Kierkegaard's difficult-to-read style of writing, repetitiveness (in writing and speech) even referring to him as a parrot.
In Jens Andersen's biography of Andersen, he addresses Andersen's and Kierkegaard's common issues: "loneliness, a fear of women, enthusiasm over fairy tales, an interest in the importance of childhood, and a desire to figure out other people."

Hans Christian Andersen actually inserted him into a play of his as a parrot, that the audience could easily identify, "an exotic bird who philosophically babbles on, constantly shaking his head and sending ripples through his birdlike coiffure and crooked nose.<snip>And many people in the city nodded with recognition at this bird who was so good at 'making a quip, quip, quip' and lavishly scattering philosophical remarks, such as: 'Now, let's be sensible people!'"
Kierkegaard was an ambitious theology student, though obsessed with fairy tales as well, needing to curb his hobby for his studies. However, his first paper was on Andersen, a critique. His disliked Andersen's sentimentality and felt fairy tales should be for adults.

Source: Jens Andersen's, Hans Christian Andersen, A New Life, A Kierkegaard Anthology and some other Kierkegaard source that's not in front of me that I read a long time ago.

I haven't heard anyone discuss Kierkegaard at all since college, let alone if he was an Aspie. On the surface, Kierkegaard and Andersen have very similar lifestyles. But I think they are dramatically different people.

Kingdom, some say that he never had delayed speech. So, there are apparently different accounts of his development.

Michaelangelio apparently had AS too.