jayssite wrote:
Sora wrote:
I'm happy. I picked the second choice anyway. I can live with being unhappy.
There is no wrong choice.
Maybe wrong and right for you, but different people mean different truths.
Wow, weird, I never thought that people could [s]be happy[/s]-- I mean, find life tolerable -- when being unhappy in life. Maybe that's a strange personality trait I never knew could possibly exist ... or maybe you're underestimating what unhappiness is like because you're happy.
I know pretty well what unhappiness feels like. But even if the world crushes down on one and one along with it, it doesn't mean you can never be happy afterwards.
I was 'unhappy', I survived, I'm happy now. Happiness in life is different from 'finding life tolerable'. I don't find life that tolerable, I know lots of intolerable things I'd love to fix at any chance, all over the world and more than I can possibly count.
I find it rather odd that several people assumes that being happy and satisfied must mean one has never experienced 'the bad things'. Or that a lack of anxiety must mean one has never faced the causes of anxiety. Or lack of depression, PTSD... suffering can happen well and frequently and severe without causing a mental disorder like these or any other. Different things for different people, neither is 'better' than the other.
Problem is, there's no measure of 'suffering'. but everyone wants it. To say one suffers, to cry out is one thing - one often very necessary thing actually - but it's another to feel in a position of power to decide how much value another's suffering (disability, happiness, life, personality, choices... the list goes on) has, which is ludicrous.