aspergers isn't a word, according to many dictionaries! huh?

Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

darkstone100
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Mar 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,965
Location: Yuma, AZ

23 Mar 2008, 8:22 pm

I guess aspergers is more of a term instead of a word.



Last edited by darkstone100 on 23 Mar 2008, 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

RampionRampage
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 743
Location: Greater Philly Area, PA

23 Mar 2008, 8:29 pm

886 wrote:
bheid wrote:
it doesn't matter.


rammstein = <3


_________________
As of 2-06-08 --- Axis I: Asperger's Disorder | Axis III: Hearing Impaired
My store: http://www.etsy.com/rampionrampage


lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,797
Location: Somerset UK

23 Mar 2008, 8:48 pm

darkstone100 wrote:
I guess aspergers is more of a term isntead of a word.

No. Just misspelt. The guy was Hans Asperger. The syndrome was named after him. I.e. it became "Asperger's syndrome". (A syndrome is not a disease, it's a collection of symptoms.) As there is only one condition named for Hans, dropping the "syndrome" is acceptable. Hence "Asperger's", with the capital and with the apostrophe.

The OED allows for the whole "'s" to be dropped. I.e. "Asperger syndome" or "Asperger disorder". Yuck.

It also lists "Asperger['s] disorder", which I find demeaning, as in use in 1991 (whereas AS started to be used in 1971).

I would hope the new word, "aspie", without a capital, does make it to the dictionaries.

============

I occurs to me that having "aspergers" would mean that you had small clones, that resembled Hans Asperger, growing out of you.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


RampionRampage
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 743
Location: Greater Philly Area, PA

23 Mar 2008, 8:58 pm

lau wrote:
I occurs to me that having "aspergers" would mean that you had small clones, that resembled Hans Asperger, growing out of you.


:!:
i love the mental images that can derive from literal interpretations of language.


_________________
As of 2-06-08 --- Axis I: Asperger's Disorder | Axis III: Hearing Impaired
My store: http://www.etsy.com/rampionrampage


SilverProteus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,915
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

23 Mar 2008, 9:33 pm

That doesn't really mean anything.


_________________
"Lightning is but a flicker of light, punctuated on all sides by darkness." - Loki


lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,797
Location: Somerset UK

23 Mar 2008, 10:07 pm

SilverProteus wrote:
That doesn't really mean anything.

Sorry?

I can only read "aspergers" to be the plural of "asperger". Now, if it had a capital, as in "having Aspergers", then it would imply that you have several members of the Asperger family (sitting on you? stalking you?).

However, I'm taking the de-capitalisation to imply the falseness of the plurality, as in clones. I also took is as a diminutive. Thus the medical condition of "having aspergers" that I suggested.

You would be quite correct to point out that such a condition does not currently exist. However, with a little nanotech, it could be arranged.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


onefourninezero
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 425

24 Mar 2008, 5:20 am

Asperger is in French dictionaries. It means to sprinkle or to spray :lol: .



SilverProteus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,915
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

24 Mar 2008, 6:08 pm

lau wrote:
SilverProteus wrote:
That doesn't really mean anything.

Sorry?

I can only read "aspergers" to be the plural of "asperger". Now, if it had a capital, as in "having Aspergers", then it would imply that you have several members of the Asperger family (sitting on you? stalking you?).

However, I'm taking the de-capitalisation to imply the falseness of the plurality, as in clones. I also took is as a diminutive. Thus the medical condition of "having aspergers" that I suggested.

You would be quite correct to point out that such a condition does not currently exist. However, with a little nanotech, it could be arranged.


I apologise - I should've quoted the OP, as it was to him I was speaking to.

I just wanted to say that, as a few have written, just because it isn't listed in a dictionary, doesn't mean anything.


_________________
"Lightning is but a flicker of light, punctuated on all sides by darkness." - Loki


lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,797
Location: Somerset UK

24 Mar 2008, 6:43 pm

aspergers isn't a word.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer