donkey wrote:
ok look up wiki, the word gestalt.
I already inderstand what that means.
Quote:
when i say appear.....i link many different things together, symbols and then i tend to "get" an overall picture that materialises.
so the symbols i have linked together make something, a picture which isnt in my memory or mind.
does this make sense?
such a fascinating topic so hard to explain verbally.
That sounds interesting, although I was more getting at what the primary medium of thoughts are not how you derive meaning and whether it is cryptic or not. It is visual as I thought. You probably do most of you thinking like this so it didn't occur to you to make this deduction.
I cannot picture therefore I cannot have thought like you do or any the poster here do. I can not have thought in sound either. My thoughts are also gestalt like but I'm not aware of anything appearing or a thought process as such. It is probably difficult for you to comprehend. I have a hard enough time understanding it myself. That is because I’m detached form my thoughts call it ‘black box’ thinking if you like.
From my experience of surveying and discussing this, most people especially ‘NTs’ think primarily in visuals. Also most are able to achieve photographic quality (which is isn’t as remarkable as people make out) There are exceptions where the there thoughts are mostly in sounds. I don’t know if there are any that are primarily in tactile feeling or something.