"ret*d"
MemberSix wrote:
demoluca wrote:
While I do agree that calling something ret*d when it's not is bad, I don't see why being a bit slow is bad.
So what if maybe they aren't as 'smart' as you are? Does that make them some sort of green, shameful, disgusting bug?
MR technically is a disability, but who are we to judge it? I say let people live as they will, slow, 'ret*d', genius, or normal.
What if you learned how to do it all in a short period, decide that it's boring, and then revert to your old state because you didn't like all those little social things?
So what if maybe they aren't as 'smart' as you are? Does that make them some sort of green, shameful, disgusting bug?
MR technically is a disability, but who are we to judge it? I say let people live as they will, slow, 'ret*d', genius, or normal.
Quote:
AS is social retardation.
What if you learned how to do it all in a short period, decide that it's boring, and then revert to your old state because you didn't like all those little social things?
But you didn't.
No Aspie ever has.
Sure, you can conform - but you'll never feel the same way or get the same out of socializing as a full-blown NT.
Aspies can kid themselves they've tried NTypicality and discarded it in favour of Aspidity, all they like.
But they'll still just be kidding themselves.
But all I see here is alot of aspies getting nothing from socializing. I get too much.
Is that wrong...?
_________________
.?´¸.?*¨) ¸.?*¨)
(¸.?´ (¸.?´ .?´ ¸¸.?¨¯`?.
demoluca wrote:
MemberSix wrote:
demoluca wrote:
While I do agree that calling something ret*d when it's not is bad, I don't see why being a bit slow is bad.
So what if maybe they aren't as 'smart' as you are? Does that make them some sort of green, shameful, disgusting bug?
MR technically is a disability, but who are we to judge it? I say let people live as they will, slow, 'ret*d', genius, or normal.
What if you learned how to do it all in a short period, decide that it's boring, and then revert to your old state because you didn't like all those little social things?
So what if maybe they aren't as 'smart' as you are? Does that make them some sort of green, shameful, disgusting bug?
MR technically is a disability, but who are we to judge it? I say let people live as they will, slow, 'ret*d', genius, or normal.
Quote:
AS is social retardation.
What if you learned how to do it all in a short period, decide that it's boring, and then revert to your old state because you didn't like all those little social things?
But you didn't.
No Aspie ever has.
Sure, you can conform - but you'll never feel the same way or get the same out of socializing as a full-blown NT.
Aspies can kid themselves they've tried NTypicality and discarded it in favour of Aspidity, all they like.
But they'll still just be kidding themselves.
But all I see here is alot of aspies getting nothing from socializing. I get too much.
Is that wrong...?
We weren't discussing whether that's wrong.
We were discussing the relevance of the term 'ret*d' WRT Aspies.
demoluca wrote:
But all I see here is alot of aspies getting nothing from socializing.
Because they don't know how to do it. Other people get jobs, relationships, and pleasure out of socialising.
The fact that people with AS don't get anything from socialising is makes them socially ret*d.
Quote:
Because they don't know how to do it. Other people get jobs, relationships, and pleasure out of socialising.
But what about aspies who get nothing from it but know how to do it?
Or ones that get to much pleasure to the point of overstimulation?
_________________
.?´¸.?*¨) ¸.?*¨)
(¸.?´ (¸.?´ .?´ ¸¸.?¨¯`?.
ret*d, like gay, is an insult that gets applied regardless of whether the normal meaning of the word is true. Someone can be a "ret*d" without being mentally ret*d, and someone can be "gay" without being homosexual. Heck, both "ret*d" and "gay" can be applied to things and ideas, not just people.
Not that I agree with the use of such insults. But I think taking them overly literally is missing the point.
I know what people mean them to be. I just don't like the way that they are using descriptions of people, words that ought to be neutral, to insult people. It's like what would happen if people insulted each other by comparing them to you... even if it became a figure of speech, you still probably wouldn't like it very much.
demoluca wrote:
Quote:
Because they don't know how to do it. Other people get jobs, relationships, and pleasure out of socialising.
But what about aspies who get nothing from it but know how to do it?
Or ones that get to much pleasure to the point of overstimulation?
Getting nothing from socialization, but being able to socialize, would be a personality trait rather than a sign of Asperger's--probably something like being very introverted.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com