The (so-called)5 Geek Social Fallacies

Page 2 of 2 [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Warsie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,542
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

11 Oct 2008, 1:50 am

OP's article

Quote:
For some reason, many GSF5 carriers are willing to make an exception for gender-segregated events. I don't know why.


social awkwardness and newbiness to dealing with the opposite sex, "mixed signals" (more likely to be sent be social awkward geeks), "friend zone" and afraid of "crossing that" and "getting awkward" in male/female events, etc. When these people are n00bs at it and likely have a diagnosed social disadvantage its a good idea NOT to get involved in that dangerous, destructive s**t...

and the joke of "Oh, friends do EVERYTHING together! 'Friends with Benefits' then? ;)" hehe. well thats part of the aforementioned paragraph.

Electric_Kite wrote:
I'm certain that the reason my co-workers were annoyed with me when I told them that I didn't go to their get-togethers because they never invited me is that I reminded them that they'd repeatedly broken a rule of manners that is taught in Kindergarten.


[mainstream social butterfly BS]You apparently disrespected them or appeared to be sarcastic to them as you were "playing dumb" and that pissed them off as you're supposed to know you're in the group and though theyre not talking to you/about you specifically it is obvious they do they do include you[/mainstream social butterfly BS]

that's my guess. it came off as 'offensive' or 'disrespectful' or 'playing dumb'....well they assumed it probably.

Quote:
Anyway, it's possible that they all think you've been invited because everybody is talking about it in front of you as if you have been, and each assumes that some other has actually asked you.


that might be true partially.

Quote:
[b\I get you about the sting. [/b]I did not want to go to these things. I was part irritated at the rudeness of them discussing them without inviting me,.


yes...

EDIT: I can understand/agree with his points about #5 and #4 to a lesser extent...but others not so much..


_________________
I am a Star Wars Fan, Warsie here.
Masterdebating on chi-city's south side.......!


Last edited by Warsie on 11 Oct 2008, 2:10 am, edited 2 times in total.

Warsie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,542
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

11 Oct 2008, 2:05 am

Biogeek wrote:
, I don't think it's unreasonable to invite everyone in the office to go. I mean, really, what's the purpose of excluding a few of us? Does it make them feel superior? Your guess is as good as mine. But godamnit, to be honest, it hurts. :-(


they don't give a s**t likely and didn't bother...or as you were not 'connected' enough to the rest of the group via bonding and the like ("knowing someone close"); the information was not transmitted directly to you from "someone you knew that way". I'm more likely it's the lack of connection thing...it could be a combination too. and the assumptions. in groups there's various reasons for things to happen.

Quote:
I'm so literal and hell-bent on rules that I assume I'm not wanted if I'm not invited.


I am too..


_________________
I am a Star Wars Fan, Warsie here.
Masterdebating on chi-city's south side.......!


Electric_Kite
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 500
Location: crashing to the ground

11 Oct 2008, 3:43 am

Warsie wrote:
you're supposed to know you're in the group and though theyre not talking to you/about you specifically it is obvious they do they do include you[/mainstream social butterfly BS]


Very likely. I often do not know if people believe I am with them or simply nearby.



Warsie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,542
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

11 Oct 2008, 11:56 pm

Electric_Kite wrote:
Very likely. I often do not know if people believe I am with them or simply nearby.


possibly that too, but it could also be that they assume you're "part of the group" as in you're socially "close" to them (at least one of them) and should "know better" therefore.... :?:


_________________
I am a Star Wars Fan, Warsie here.
Masterdebating on chi-city's south side.......!


Electric_Kite
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 500
Location: crashing to the ground

12 Oct 2008, 3:35 pm

Warsie wrote:
could also be that they assume you're "part of the group" as in you're socially "close" to them (at least one of them) and should "know better" therefore.... :?:


Trouble is, it's impossible to tell. There have been occassions where there are a few people having a conversation near me and if I glance up from what I'm doing and add to the conversation, they become offended, as if I had been invisible the moment before and deliberately used this invisibility-power to listen in to a private conversation. Other occassions, they're doing the exact same thing but expect me to act as if I was included.